Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 16;10:11708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68602-1

Table 2.

Pre- and post-training biochemical analysis.

Variables CTL (n = 25) RT (n = 30) p value-interaction
Hemoglobin, g/Dl—pre-intervention 11.2 ± 0.9 10.9 ± 0.6 0.0054a
Hemoglobin, g/dL—post-intervention 10.6 ± 0.5b 10.7 ± 0.9
Ferritin, ng/mL—pre-intervention 242.7 ± 102.3 230.4 ± 78.5 0.0071a
Ferritin, ng/Ml—post-intervention 245.8 ± 110.1 174.0 ± 58.1c
Albumin, g/dL—pre-intervention 4.1 ± 0.5 4.1 ± 0.7 0.7846
Albumin, g/dL—post-intervention 4.0 ± 0.6 4.0 ± 0.6
Urea pre-HD, mg/dL—Pre-intervention 106.2 ± 26.9 100.9 ± 19.7 0.3978
Urea pre-HD, mg/dL—post-intervention 101.2 ± 26.3 101.7 ± 24.5
Urea post-HD, mg/dL—pre-intervention 53.1 ± 11.3 50.6 ± 10.3 0.9684
Urea post-HD, mg/dL—post-intervention 55.0 ± 11.8 52.4 ± 10.1
Potassium, mEq/L—Pre-intervention 5.2 ± 0.6 5.4 ± 1.0 0.3716
Potassium, mEq/L—post-intervention 5.4 ± 0.6 5.5 ± 0.6
Phosphate, mg/dL—pre-intervention 5.7 ± 0.6 5.5 ± 0.8 < 0.01a
Phosphate, mg/dL—post-intervention 5.0 ± 0.8b 5.0 ± 0.9b

Data demonstrated in mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA including within and between groups analysis followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test was adopted to compare the biochemical analysis. Values in bold highlight the significance established by p < 0.05

CTL control group, RT resistance training group, pre-HD urea collected before hemodialysis session, post-HD urea collected after hemodialysis session.

aGroup versus time interaction.

bVersus Pre-intervention (time effect).

cVersus CTL (group effect).