Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 17;39(12):2271–2277. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03978-6

Table 3.

Detection differences between the chemiluminescence and ELISA method

Methods Control group (total 64 cases) SARS-CoV-2 confirmed patients (total 65 cases)
IgM false-positive
/%
IgG false-positive
/%
IgM-positive
/%
IgG-positive
/%

ELISA

Chemiluminescence

Identified in both

14/21.8%

6/9.38%

1/1.56%

0/0%

2/3.1%

0/0%

30/46.1%

40/61.54%

25/38.46%

15/23%

53/81.5%

15/23%