Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 18;2:116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.002

Table 1.

Methodological questions for the resilience dialogue.

Context Questions
Extent
  • To what extent can/does the individual cope?

  • Under which circumstances?

Change
  • Is resilience based on a structural or individual change or both?

  • What changes the individual and the society need to achieve to overcome this adversity?

Knowledge
  • What knowledge is needed to be more resilient at the individual and leadership levels?

Values
  • Which values will we choose to drive economic, political, and individual choices?

Vulnerability
  • Is there a differentiated vulnerability among people?

Philosophy
  • Can philosophical/spiritual approaches/practices increase the individual’s resilience and self-healing?

Consciousness
  • Can we help ourselves to remain strong facing the adversity by extracting courage and wisdom from within?

  • What truths from our unconscious do we need to recall?

  • Can the human-ecological interconnections’ awareness make us more resilient and responsible?

Science
  • Whom and what can we trust in coping with the hazard?

Leadership
  • What kind of leadership is needed?

Post-hazard time
  • Can societies and economies restart after the lockdown?