Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;2020:3261714. doi: 10.1155/2020/3261714

Table 2.

Comparison of the mitral annulus parameters, measured at mid-systolic frame, between patients with functional mitral regurgitation and control subjects.

Functional mitral regurgitation Control subjects p
(N = 56) (N = 52)
MA dimensions
AP diameter (mm) 3.4 ± 0.5 2.8 ± 0.4 <0.001
ALPM diameter (mm) 4.4 ± 0.5 3.9 ± 0.5 <0.001
Commissural diameter (mm) 4.3 ± 0.5 3.9 ± 0.5 <0.001
MA circumference (cm) 12.9 ± 1.6 11.2 ± 1.2 <0.05
MA area 2D (cm2) 12.2 ± 3 8.9 ± 2.1 <0.001
MA area 3D (cm2) 12.4 ± 3.1 9.2 ± 2.2 <0.001
ALA (cm2) 8.2 ± 1.9 6.2 ± 1.4 <0.001
ALL (cm) 2.8 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.3 <0.001
PLA (cm2) 7.0 ± 2.06 4.0 ± 1.2 <0.001
PLL (cm) 1.4 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.2 <0.001
ALA/PLA ratio 1.2 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.5 <0.001

MA geometry
Sphericity index 0.80 ± 0.08 0.72 ± 0.06 <0.001
NPA (°) 157 ± 11 145 ± 10 <0.001
Annular height (mm) 6.2 ± 1.8 6.8 ± 1.5 0.125
Tenting volume (cm3) 5.2 ± 1.8 1.9 ± 0.8 <0.001
Tenting area (cm2) 2.3 ± 0.7 1.2 ± 0.4 <0.001
Tenting height (mm) 10 ± 2 6 ± 1 <0.001
Angle Ao-AP (°) 145 ± 12 130 ± 13 <0.001

ALA: anterior leaflet area; ALL: anterior leaflet length; angle Ao-AP: angle between aorta and the highest plane of mitral annulus; AP: anteroposterior; ALPM: anterolateral-posteromedial; MA: mitral annulus; PLA: posterior leaflet area; PLL: posterior leaflet length; NPA: nonplanarity angle.