Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;117(28):16154–16159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002446117

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Theory of spindle pole focusing. (A) Averaged retardance images of egg extract spindles under different concentrations of the dynein inhibitor p150-CC1. Images correspond to different titration days. (Scale bars: 20 μm.) (B) The spindle is described as a tactoid of length 2L, width 2r, and pole-to-pole distance 2R. The two dimensionless parameters describing the spindle shape are the pole focusing parameter Φ=L/R and the aspect ratio a=r/L. The spindle is parameterized using bispherical coordinates {ξ,η,φ}, and the director field p follows the ξ coordinate (SI Appendix). (C) Dimensionless energy of the spindle relative to the cylindrical configuration ΔU/γL2 as a function of the pole focusing parameter Φ for two different values of the stress σ. The shape is found by minimizing ΔU=U(Φ)U(0). (D) Phase diagram of how spindle shape changes as a function of the contractile stress σ and the surface tension at the poles ω. (Inset) Evolution of σ and ω as a function of the dimensionless volume ν. (E) Bifurcation diagram considering dynein contractility σ as the control parameter: Below a certain critical contractility σc the cylindrical configuration Φ=0 is stable. Once the contractility exceeds the threshold value σc, the structure undergoes axisymmetric buckling, acquiring a barrel-like shape. The solid curve corresponds to the full solution, and the dashed curve corresponds to the analytical solution expanding the energy up to quartic order in Φ (SI Appendix). The study is done in the limit of constant volume (AL/γ) with parameters K1/K3=1, K1/γL=0.1, ω/γ=0.3, and ν=1.2.