Table II.
Type of analysis | Data type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Mixed effects models | Continuous (linear mixed effects model), categorical or count (non-linear mixed effects models) | • Allows for imbalanced data size and informative missingness (i.e. the number of cycles a woman contributes depends on the outcomes of her prior cycles) • Models can specify multiple correlations |
• More difficult to implement and require sufficient statistical training • Models are sometimes unstable and may not converge |
Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) | Continuous, categorical, count | • Can be used as an alternative to non-linear mixed models when they do not converge • Have a different interpretation than mixed effects models (population-averaged versus individual-level effects) |
|
Discrete survival | Time-to-event (e.g. first live birth) | • Easy to implement • Censors on the outcome, making it appropriate for the use of first live birth as an outcome |
• Can only accommodate one event at a time, though many ART events can be experienced in multiple cycles, such as implantation failure or live birth |