Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 16;8(1):e001272. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001272

Table 2.

Gender-specific associations between social network properties and metabolic syndrome (n=10 103)*

Gender Social network properties No. of people No. (%) metabolic syndrome Model 1† Model 2‡ Model 3§ Model 4¶
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Community-based low-risk participants (n=8097)
Men
(n=2808)
Size of social network
 Large (≥4) 1134 291 (25.66) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Small (≤3) 1674 513 (30.65) 1.26 (1.06 to 1.50) 1.25 (1.05 to 1.48) 1.23 (1.04 to 1.47) 1.20 (1.01 to 1.43)
 Per 1-unit decrease 1.07 (1.02 to 1.12) 1.07 (1.02 to 1.12) 1.06 (1.01 to 1.11) 1.05 (1.00 to 1.11)
Social network closeness
 High (≥3.2) 1373 376 (27.39) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Low (<3.2) 1435 428 (29.83) 1.11 (0.94 to 1.31) 1.10 (0.93 to 1.30) 1.08 (0.91 to 1.28) 1.07 (0.91 to 1.27)
 Per 1-unit decrease 1.01 (0.89 to 1.16) 1.00 (0.88 to 1.15) 0.99 (0.87 to 1.13) 0.99 (0.86 to 1.13)
Women
(n=5289)
Size of social network
 Large (≥4) 2491 380 (15.25) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Small (≤3) 2798 573 (20.48) 1.35 (1.17 to 1.57) 1.32 (1.14 to 1.53) 1.28 (1.11 to 1.49) 1.26 (1.09 to 1.46)
 Per 1-unit decrease 1.11 (1.06 to 1.16) 1.10 (1.05 to 1.15) 1.09 (1.04 to 1.14) 1.08 (1.03 to 1.13)
Social network closeness
 High (≥3.2) 2504 436 (17.41) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Low (<3.2) 2785 517 (18.56) 0.94 (0.81 to 1.08) 0.90 (0.78 to 1.04) 0.90 (0.78 to 1.05) 0.90 (0.78 to 1.05)
 Per 1-unit decrease 0.96 (0.86 to 1.08) 0.93 (0.83 to 1.05) 0.94 (0.83 to 1.05) 0.94 (0.83 to 1.05)
Hospital-based high-risk participants (n=2006)
Men
(n=1168)
Size of social network
 Large (≥4) 183 75 (40.98) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Small (≤3) 985 0.96 (0.70 to 1.33) 0.98 (0.71 to 1.36) 0.95 (0.69 to 1.32) 0.95 (0.68 to 1.32)
 Per 1-unit decrease 0.95 (0.87 to 1.03) 0.85 (0.87 to 1.03) 0.93 (0.86 to 1.02) 0.93 (0.85 to 1.02)
Social network closeness
 High (≥3.2) 725 292 (40.28) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Low (<3.2) 443 179 (40.41) 1.00 (0.78 to 1.27) 1.02 (0.80 to 1.30) 0.95 (0.74 to 1.22) 0.94 (0.73 to 1.21)
 Per 1-unit decrease 1.04 (0.87 to 1.24) 1.06 (0.88 to 1.27) 1.00 (0.82 to 1.20) 0.98 (0.81 to 1.19)
Women
(n=838)
Size of social network
 Large (≥4) 167 60 (35.93) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Small (≤3) 671 305 (45.45) 1.45 (1.02 to 2.07) 1.40 (0.97 to 2.00) 1.47 (1.01 to 2.13) 1.46 (1.00 to 2.12)
 Per 1-unit decrease 1.10 (0.99 to 1.21) 1.08 (0.97 to 1.19) 1.09 (0.98 to 1.21) 1.08 (0.98 to 1.20)
Social network closeness
 High (≥3.2) 542 226 (41.70) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Low (<3.2) 296 139 (46.96) 1.16 (0.87 to 1.54) 1.16 (0.86 to 1.56) 1.07 (0.79 to 1.44) 1.06 (0.78 to 1.44)
 Per 1-unit decrease 1.11 (0.90 to 1.37) 1.12 (0.91 to 1.39) 1.05 (0.85 to 1.31) 1.05 (0.85 to 1.31)

Significant values are in bold.

*All results are from the dataset after multiple imputation by chained equations, with a chain length of 10.

†Adjusted for age.

‡Adjusted for age, household income and education.

§Adjusted for age, household income, education and comorbidities.

¶Adjusted for age, household income, education, comorbidities, drinking status, smoking status and physical activity.