Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):807–819. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01118-2

Table 4.

Unstandardized and standardized causal coefficient estimates with confidence intervals for predictors of Year 3, GTO performance

Cause of Year 3, GTO performance Causal coefficient (b) Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI z Standardized coefficient (β) Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI
Year 2, GTO dosage −0.030* −0.054 −0.006 −2.48 −0.61 −1.08 −0.13
Year 2, Prior experience teaching CHOICE 0.094 −0.063 0.251 1.17 0.30 −0.20 0.79
Year 2, Received CHOICE training 0.807 0.017 1.597 2.00 0.50 0.08 0.92
Baseline Organizational Support for Evidence-based Practicesa 0.413 −0.459 1.285 χ2 (2, n = 11) = 2.34, p = .311 0.28 −0.29 0.85
Baseline GTO knowledge a 0.125 −0.159 0.409 0.26 −0.32 0.84
CFIR (in Year 2) 0.640*b 0.411 0.869 5.48 0.78 0.46 1.10

Note: GTO site N = 13. Tabled values are causal coefficient estimates except where noted, with confidence intervals, test statistics, and standardized regression coefficients.

a

Predictors tested simultaneously; reported test statistic is Wald χ2 with 2 degrees of freedom.

b

Not established as a causal estimate; path is potentially confounded within the framework of the graphical causal model.

*

Statistically significant after false discovery rate correction, adjusted ps < .05.