Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 19;14(5):1323–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.029

Table 2.

Comparison between Quarantine and Reverse quarantine.

Features Quarantine Reverse quarantine
Separating Those who are at risk of development of disease, because of contact with an infected individual Those who are at risk of developing severe illness if infected
Duration Maximal incubation period of the illness Till the diseases is under control in that geographical area
People Any individual who is at the risk of development of illness Elderly or people with co-morbidities like diabetes, hypertension, renal disease
Purpose To stop the transmission in the general population from potentially infective individual Not much role in the prevention of transmission in the general population. To prevent infection in those who are at risk of developing critical illness
Place Home or institutional Most of the time home
Economic impact Affect the financial status of the family, if he is the earning member of the family. Elderly and those with other illness, may not be the earning member of the family.
During RQ, society functions as usual, so that not much economic issues compared to lock down and quarantine.
Psychological issues Results in psychological issues Can lead to psychological issues, but may be less
Requirement Early detection of cases and contact tracing are important to implement effective quarantine measures Presence of the diseases under consideration in that geographical area is the pre requisite for RQ
Benefits Helps to reduce disease burden
Controlling the pandemic by reducing the risk of transmission
Younger/healthy individuals will get mild infection and develop herd immunity, while older people get the benefit of it
Altering the pandemic into a less harmful disease by reducing the chance of development of severe illness/critical illness
Net results Reduces the number of cases in the society Reduces the number of severe cases, requiring hospitalisation. Reduces the morbidity and mortality in the society