Table 2. Porewater results from four sampling events in 2017–2018.

	DOC (mg/L)	TN (mg/L)	SUVA (L/mg-m)	DOC (mg/L)		TN (mg/L)	SUVA (L/mg-m)
	June 2017			May 2018
Impacted Spruce	5.3 (±1.4)	0.49 (±0.19)	2.2 (±0.8)	6.6 (±2.1)		BDL	3.0 (±0.8)
Healthy Spruce	9.3 (±5.1)	0.67 (±0.29)	2.4 (±1.0)	9.4 (±3.1)		BDL	4.8 (±4.4)
Lodgepole	4.3 (±1.1)	0.38 (±0.14)	2.1 (±0.9)	10.3 (±3.3)		0.32 (±0.30)	3.7 (±0.8)
Control	4.9 (±2.1)	0.50 (±0.21)	2.5 (±1.2)	6.3 (±1.8)		BDL	3.8 (±0.6)
	October 2017			October 2018
Impacted Spruce	6.7 (±2.3)	0.38 (±0.12)	1.85 (±0.87)	9.4–		0.57–	2.1–
Healthy Spruce	14.9 (±6.2)	0.79 (±0.29)	2.10 (±0.99)	14.1 (±3.0)		0.92 (±0.29)	2.4 (±0.6)
Lodgepole	12.4 (±3.4)	0.63 (±0.24)	1.78 (±0.54)	16.8 (±5.9)		0.76 (±0.10)	4.3 -
Control	11.8 (±2.0)	0.68 (±0.04)	1.84 (±0.60)	13.0–		0.958–	–

Notes:

Each parameter was averaged across two consecutive days of sampling to increase sample size.

Standard deviation shown in parenthesis.

BDL = below detection limits.