Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;21(8):987–997. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0237

Table 2. Performance of Deep Learning Algorithm in Liver and Spleen Segmentation in Test Dataset-1.

Dice Similarity Score
Liver Segmentation Spleen Segmentation
Total 0.973 ± 0.019 (0.907–0.999) 0.974 ± 0.018 (0.940–0.999)
Subgroups
 Healthy liver 0.975 ± 0.017 (0.974–0.999) 0.971 ± 0.017 (0.948–0.998)
 Fatty liver disease 0.976 ± 0.019 (0.952–0.999) 0.974 ± 0.018 (0.947–0.999)
 Non-cirrhotic chronic liver disease 0.974 ± 0.019 (0.945–0.999) 0.974 ± 0.018 (0.944–0.999)
 Liver cirrhosis 0.970 ± 0.016 (0.926–0.997) 0.978 ± 0.018 (0.940–0.999)
 Post-hepatectomy 0.968 ± 0.030 (0.907–0.999) 0.972 ± 0.020 (0.947–0.999)
p value* 0.6 0.26

Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; data in parentheses are range. *p values for comparison of dice similarity score among five subgroups using Kruskal-Wallis test.