Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 20;59(12):1353–1363.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.11.022

TABLE 2.

Model Fit Statistics for Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) Models With Two to Six Classes

No. of Classes AICa BICa aBICa LMRT p Value PBLRT p Value Entropy Class Proportion Based on the Estimated Model
1 2 3 4 5 6
Two 20567 20682 20584 < .001 < .001 0.84 0.51 0.49
Three 20413 20568 20436 .02 < .001 0.82 0.40 0.32 0.28
Four 20318 20514 20346 .25 < .001 0.84 0.11 0.32 0.37 0.19
Five 20239 20476 20273 .12 < .001 0.85 0.10 0.28 0.20 0.29 0.12
Six 20183 20460 20222 .57 < .001 0.84 0.08 0.11 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.15

Note: Small p values of the LMRT and PBLRT tests indicate that the model with a greater number of classes fits the data better than the previous model. Entropy closer to 1 indicates that the children are well categorized into classes. The final model is shown in boldface type for emphasis. aBIC = sample size–adjusted Bayesian information criterion; AIC = Akaike information criterion; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; LMRT = Lo–Mendell–Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test; PBLRT = parametric bootstrapped likelihood ratio test.

a

Lower numbers indicate more optimal model fit.