Table 3.
Fit indices of the path analysis.
| χ2 (d.f.) | RMR | RMSEA | GFI | NFI | CFI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TM → AOC Model | ||||||
| Model 1: independence model | 380.811 (21) | 0.958 | 0.408 | 0.382 | 0 | 0 |
| Model 2: model proposal | 19.257 (13) | 0.080 | 0.068 | 0.950 | 0.950 | 0.983 |
| AOC → SP Model | ||||||
| Model 1: independence model | 297.767 (15) | 0.948 | 0.428 | 0.432 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Model 2: model proposal | 6.700 (7) | 0.063 | 0.000 | 0.980 | 0.977 | 1.000 |
| TM → SP Model | ||||||
| Model 1: independence model | 458.572 (21) | 1.014 | 0.450 | 0.363 | 0 | 0 |
| Model 2: model proposal | 17.301 (12) | 0.094 | 0.065 | 0.955 | 0.962 | 0.988 |
| TM → SP mediated by AOC Model | ||||||
| Model 1: independence model | 637.637 (45) | 0.959 | 0.358 | 0.314 | 0 | 0 |
| Model 2: model proposal | 41.074 (30) | 0.095 | 0.060 | 0.932 | 0.936 | 0.981 |
Note. d.f. = degrees of freedom; RMR = root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; GFI = goodness of fit index; NFI = normed fit index; CFI = comparative fit index.