Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;21:497. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06892-5

Table 2.

Average RF rates (± standard error) of different methods on the 37-taxon dataset for varying numbers of missing entries and two different sequence evolution models. For each model condition, we show the average RF rate and standard error over 10 replicates. The best RF rates for various model conditions are shown in boldface

#Taxa #Entries Scaling Model #Missing Average RF Rate
Entries DAMBE LASSO MF AE
36 0.41 ±0.02 0.72 ±0.03 0.33 ±0.03 0.41 ±0.02
100 0.48 ±0.02 0.72 ±0.03 0.46 ±0.02 0.45 ±0.02
TN93 225 0.72 ±0.03 0.78 ±0.03 0.62 ±0.01 0.70 ±0.02
37 666 1X 342 N/A N/A 0.99 ±0.02 0.86 ±0.01
36 0.41 ±0.02 0.71 ±0.02 0.35 ±0.03 0.4 ±0.02
100 0.49 ±0.02 0.72 ±0.02 0.5 ±0.03 0.46 ±0.02
LogDet 225 0.72 ±0.02 0.76 ±0.02 0.66 ±0.03 0.72 ±0.02
342 N/A N/A 1 ±0 0.86 ±0.02
36 0.45 ±0.02 0.69 ±0.02 0.35 ±0.02 0.43 ±0.02
100 0.49 ±0.03 0.72 ±0.02 0.5 ±0.02 0.54 ±0.03
TN93 225 0.66 ±0.02 0.76 ±0.02 0.62 ±0.01 0.71 ±0.02
37 666 0.5X 342 N/A N/A 1 ±0 0.84 ±0.02
36 0.45 ±0.02 0.68 ±0.02 0.35 ±0.02 0.42 ±0.02
100 0.49 ±0.03 0.71 ±0.02 0.52 ±0.02 0.51 ±0.02
LogDet 225 0.64 ±0.02 0.76 ±0.01 0.66 ±0.02 0.7 ±0.02
342 N/A N/A 0.99 ±0.02 0.84 ±0.02
36 0.43 ±0.02 0.68 ±0.01 0.36 ±0.03 0.42 ±0.02
100 0.5 ±0.01 0.69 ±0.02 0.52 ±0.02 0.5 ±0.02
TN93 225 0.66 ±0.02 0.73 ±0.02 0.71 ±0.02 0.69 ±0.02
37 666 2X 342 N/A N/A 0.99 ±0.01 0.85 ±0.01
36 0.44 ±0.02 0.63 ±0.02 0.36 ±0.02 0.4 ±0.01
100 0.51 ±0.02 0.66 ±0.02 0.54 ±0.02 0.52 ±0.02
LogDet 225 0.66 ±0.02 0.73 ±0.01 0.7 ±0.02 0.69 ±0.02
342 N/A N/A 0.99 ±0.01 0.86 ±0.02