Table 5.

Regions of significance in models predicting daily subjective intoxication from consumption and operationalizations of SAM

	Daily Subjective Intoxication^a

	All βs		ROS βs^{c, d}		ROS Range		p-value in ROS^e
Variable	Low	High	Low	Low	Low	High	Low	High

Intercept	2.979	3.112	2.972	3.104	1	240	< .001	< .001

Level 2 (Person)

Male	0.101	0.109	-	-	-	-	-	-
Non-white	−0.026	−0.014	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.162	0.190	-	-	-	-	-	-
Age	−0.063	−0.057	−0.063	−0.057	1	240	.005	.010
School (A)	0.067	0.091	-	-	-	-	-	-
School (B)	0.091	0.112	-	-	-	-	-	-
AUDIT	−0.005	−0.004	-	-	-	-	-	-
CUDIT	0.013	0.01	0.013	0.014	1	240	.007	.014

Level 1 (Day)

Any daily nicotine	0.058	0.067	-	-	-	-	-	-
Any daily other drugs	0.050	0.078	-	-	-	-	-	-
Non-leaf	−0.041	−0.030	-	-	-	-	-	-
Weekend	0.112	0.129	0.112	0.129	1	240	< .001	< .001
SAM (versus CAM)	−0.091	0.095	-	-	-	-	-	-
# drinks	0.069	0.085	0.069	0.085	1	240	< .001	< .001
# drinks * SAM	−0.039	−0.017	−0.039	−0.020	1	183	< .001	.045
# marijuana uses	0.026	0.086	0.026	0.086	1	240	< .001	.001
# marijuana uses * SAM	−0.075	−0.016	−0.075	−0.016	1	240	< .001	.007

Note: AUDIT=Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; CUDIT-R=Cannabis use Disorder Identification Test Revised. ROS=region of significance. Low and high ROS range represents the range of SAM operationalizations (i.e., the duration between any one drink and one marijuana use on a given day that delineated SAM from CAM) during which a given variable was a significant predictor of daily subjective intoxication.

^a.

Values for “ROS βs” and “ROS range” are not presented when the predictor is not significant for any operationalization.

^b.

Low and high values for “All βs” represent the lowest and highest estimate across all SAM operationalizations.

^c.

Low and high “ROS βs” represent the lowest and highest estimate within the ROS.

^d.

“All βs” are equivalent to “ROS βs” when “ROS range” is 1–240 (i.e., significant in all operationalizations).

^e.

p-values are given within the ROS where significant at p < .05.