Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jun 20;59(7):3128–3135. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00105

Table 1.

Summary of the MUE and RMSD, R2 and Kendall's tau coefficient (τ) of the eight systems based on cycle closure ΔΔG values.

System # of ligands # of perturbations FEP+/OPLS 2.1 (kcal/mol) AMBER GPU-TI/AMBER FF14SB + GAFF (1.8) (kcal/mol) Difference* (kcal/mol)

MUE RMSD R2 τ MUE RMSD R2 τ MUE RMSD

Thrombin 11 16 0.76 0.93 0.17 0.21 0.46 0.62 0.50 0.54 −0.30 −0.31
Tyk2 16 24 0.75 0.93 0.48 0.54 1.07 1.27 0.24 0.26 0.32 0.34
Jnk1 21 31 0.78 1.00 0.35 0.44 1.07 1.45 0.05 0.23 0.29 0.45
CDK2 16 25 0.91 1.11 0.15 0.30 0.97 1.13 0.35 0.46 0.06 0.02
PTP1B 23 49 0.89 1.22 0.43 0.55 1.06 1.40 0.35 0.51 0.17 0.18
BACE 36 58 0.84 1.03 0.37 0.36 1.20 1.47 0.27 0.31 0.36 0.44
MCL1 42 71 1.16 1.41 0.26 0.35 1.52 1.83 0.16 0.28 0.36 0.42
P38a 34 56 0.80 1.03 0.62 0.60 1.20 1.56 0.31 0.39 0.40 0.53
Overall 199 330 0.90 1.14 0.36 0.44 1.17 1.50 0.23 0.34 0.27 0.36
*

The difference is calculated as AMBER MUE or RMSD minus Schrodinger MUE or RMSD.