Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e036777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036777

Table 3.

Association between receiving treatment and sociodemographic characteristics in people with depressive symptoms in last year, only in 2018

Model crude
PR (95% CI)
Adjusted model *
PR (95% CI)
Sex
 Male 1 1
 Female 1.42 (0.96 to 2.10) 1.30 (0.88 to 1.92)
Age
 15–34 1 1
 35–54 0.92 (0.64 to 1.32) 0.98 (0.69 to 1.41)
 55–74 1.09 (0.71 to 1.67) 1.23 (0.81 to 1.87)
 75+ 0.85 (0.37 to 1.91) 1.08 (0.49 to 2.39)
Area
 Rural 1 1
 Urban 2.18 (1.58 to 3.00)* 0.81 (0.48 to 1.37)
Wealth index
 Very low 1 1
 Low 1.65 (1.05 to 2.60) 1.89 (1.06 to 3.38)
 Middle 2.84 (1.78 to 4.50) 3.36 (1.73 to 6.53)
 High 3.32 (2.04 to 5.40) 3.92 (1.96 to 7.87)
 Very high 4.25 (2.65 to 6.81) 5.08 (2.54 to 10.18)

Analysis is done by subgroups, considering only people who have depressive symptoms, the complex sampling was used.

Bold values have a significance of p<0.001.

*Adjusted by sex, age, wealth index and area.

PR, prevalence ratio.