Table 3.
Association between receiving treatment and sociodemographic characteristics in people with depressive symptoms in last year, only in 2018
| Model crude PR (95% CI) |
Adjusted model * PR (95% CI) |
|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 1 | 1 |
| Female | 1.42 (0.96 to 2.10) | 1.30 (0.88 to 1.92) |
| Age | ||
| 15–34 | 1 | 1 |
| 35–54 | 0.92 (0.64 to 1.32) | 0.98 (0.69 to 1.41) |
| 55–74 | 1.09 (0.71 to 1.67) | 1.23 (0.81 to 1.87) |
| 75+ | 0.85 (0.37 to 1.91) | 1.08 (0.49 to 2.39) |
| Area | ||
| Rural | 1 | 1 |
| Urban | 2.18 (1.58 to 3.00)* | 0.81 (0.48 to 1.37) |
| Wealth index | ||
| Very low | 1 | 1 |
| Low | 1.65 (1.05 to 2.60) | 1.89 (1.06 to 3.38) |
| Middle | 2.84 (1.78 to 4.50) | 3.36 (1.73 to 6.53) |
| High | 3.32 (2.04 to 5.40) | 3.92 (1.96 to 7.87) |
| Very high | 4.25 (2.65 to 6.81) | 5.08 (2.54 to 10.18) |
Analysis is done by subgroups, considering only people who have depressive symptoms, the complex sampling was used.
Bold values have a significance of p<0.001.
*Adjusted by sex, age, wealth index and area.
PR, prevalence ratio.