Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Res. 2009 May 14;156(2):340–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.024

TABLE 6.

Cox Proportional Hazard Model for Ependymomas

Hazard ratio 95% CI P value
Gender Female Reference group
Male 1.17 1.034 to 1.379 0.043
Age (y)
0–2 Reference group
3–9 0.439 0.332 to 0.582 <0.001
10–19 0.317 0.226 to 0.445 <0.001
20–29 0.384 0.276 to 0.534 0.001
30–39 0.357 0.259 to 0.493 <0.001
40–49 0.479 0.352 to 0.652 <0.001
50–59 0.839 0.636 to 1.108 0.216
60–69 1.384 1.029 to 1.861 0.031
70–79 1.992 1.435 to 2.765 <0.001
80+ 2.949 1.724 to 5.042 <0.001
Site
 Spinal cord Reference group
 Supratentorial 3.575 2.881 to 4.435 <0.001
Cortex 3.517 2.795 to 4.425 <0.001
Ventricle 3.24 2.507 to 4.188 <0.001
 Infratentorial 3.143 2.490 to 3.967 <0.001
Brain stem 3.081 2.410 to 3.938 <0.001
Cerebellum 3.214 2.335 to 4.423 <0.001
 Other 2.911 0.717 to 11.829 0.135
WHO grade
Grade II ependymomas Reference group
Grade III anaplastic ependymomas 1.639 1.325 to 2.028 <0.001
Surgery
Yes Reference group
No 1.992 1.441 to 2.754 <0.001
*Radiation
Yes Reference group
No 1.748 1.078 to 2.834 0.024
*

Subset of patients (n = 316) who had partial resection.