Table 4. Comparative Results of Qualitative Analysis between cDWI1500 and sDWI1500.
| Parameters | Readers | cDWI1500 | Percent Agreement (%) | sDWI1500 | Percent Agreement (%) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suppression of normal glandular tissue | 1 | 3.56 ± 0.91 | 72.0 | 3.14 ± 0.95 | 56.0 | < 0.001 |
| 2 | 3.76 ± 0.62 | 3.50 ± 0.81 | < 0.001 | |||
| Overall image quality | 1 | 3.86 ± 0.50 | 70.0 | 3.42 ± 0.70 | 44.0 | < 0.001 |
| 2 | 3.60 ± 0.70 | 3.28 ± 0.90 | 0.002 | |||
| Lesion conspicuity | 1 | 3.44 ± 0.97 | 68.0 | 3.54 ± 0.97 | 64.0 | 0.025 |
| 2 | 3.34 ± 0.82 | 3.50 ± 0.86 | 0.046 |
Data are mean ± standard deviation. P values were calculated using Wilcoxon signed rank test.