Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 5;43(8):1829–1835. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0951

Table 2.

Comparison of the baseline clinical characteristics and small and large nerve fiber parameters of 101 patients with diabetes and RCNFL and the 489 without

Characteristic Diabetes with RCNFL Diabetes with stable CNFL P value
(n = 101) (n = 489)
Female sex 39 (39) 216 (44) 0.30
Age (year) 47.33 ± 18.01 46.90 ± 18.76 0.83
BMI (kg/m2) 28.56 ± 5.98 27.25 ± 5.90 0.052
Triglycerides 1.47 ± 1.08 1.29 ± 0.91 0.14
T1D/T2D, n 64/37 335/154 0.30
Diabetes duration (year) 19.76 ± 14.85 18.70 ± 14.04 0.50
HbA1c (%) 8.18 ± 1.68 7.96 ± 1.51 0.20
Baseline DSP 47 (47) 144 (30) 0.001
DSP signs 3.81 ± 3.67 2.64 ± 3.09 0.004
DSP symptoms 2.28 ± 3.59 1.75 ± 3.35 0.13
Small nerve fiber measures
 Baseline CNFL (mm/mm2) 14.37 ± 4.22 13.52 ± 4.32 0.073
 Cooling detection (°C) 25.90 (20.00, 28.10) 27.20 (23.40, 29.20) <0.001
Large nerve fiber measure
 Vibration perception (V) 15.72 ± 11.60 15.18 ± 16.68 0.70
 Sural AMP (μV) 8.07 ± 8.28 9.68 ± 8.49 0.085
 Sural CV (m/s) 39.62 ± 7.73 40.76 ± 7.89 0.10
 Peroneal AMP (mV) 3.66 ± 2.33 4.13 ± 2.57 0.092
 Peroneal CV (m/s) 40.86 ± 7.02 42.83 ± 7.20 0.013
 Peroneal F-wave (ms) 56.00 (51.40, 71.30) 54.20 (49.20, 63.95) 0.030

Data are presented as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (%). P value for comparison between diabetes control patients and the subcohort of patients with diabetes and RCNFL. CV, conduction velocity.