Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 27;15(1):e04665. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4665

Table 4.

β‐Lactam antimicrobials in waste milk samples from 103 farms in England and Wales

Waste milk results type for antimicrobials detected Antimicrobial detected (μg/kg)
AMX AMP CLX PEN‐G LEX CFL HAP CFQ
Number waste milks positive 7 0 4 33 6 8 3 22
Mean conc. waste milks > LOD 258 NA 80 371 132 98 882 1433
Median conc. waste milks > LOD 18 NA 43 120 25 26 140 985
Mean conc. all waste milks 18 NA 3 119 8 8 26 306
Median conc. all waste milks < LOD NA < LOD < LOD < LOD < LOD < LOD < LOD
Maximum conc. 1300 NA 230 2500 660 580 2500 4600
Minimum conc. > LOD 5 NA 4 5 4 6 5 6
95% of samples at/below conc. 6 4 4 700 4 18 4 2200
Detection limit 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
No. addeda 14 3 8 45 13 8 3 34
Unexpected positiveb 2 0 1 5 1 3 0 1
MRL μg/kgc 4 4 30 4 100 20 60 20

Table adapted from Randall et al. (2014).

AMX: amoxicillin; AMP: ampicillin; CLX: cloxacillin; PEN‐G: penicillin G; LEX: cefalexin (1st generation cephalosporin); CFL: cefalonium (1st generation cephalosporin); HAP: cefapirin (1st generation cephalosporin); CFQ: cefquinome (4th generation cephalosporin); conc.: concentration; LOD: limit of detection; NA: not applicable.

a

No. added refers to the number of farms that reported adding stated antimicrobial to the waste milk tank via milk from treated cows.

b

Unexpected positives are where the sample was positive for stated antimicrobial but the farmer had not reported in a voluntary survey the recent use of the stated antimicrobial for cows contributing to waste milk. This does not relate to non‐compliance with farm recording obligations.

c

MRL: Maximum residue limit in milk (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/20103).