Table 15.

Summary of the contribution of each of the studies (summarised in Tables 11–14) to each of the remarks

No.a	Studies supporting the conclusion	Microbial organisms (isolated from calf faeces), antimicrobials (AMs) and/or resistance mechanisms investigated
1	Dolejská et al. (2008)	Escherichia coli; 12 AMs
	Kyselková et al. (2015)	tet (tetracycline resistance) genes by PCR
	Duse et al. (2015)	E. coli; 12 AMs
	Brunton et al. (2014)	E. coli; cefquinome
	Aust et al. (2013)	E. coli; 25 AMs
	Langford et al. (2003)	Bacteria; penicillin
	Pereira et al. (2014)	E. coli; ceftofur, penicillin, ampicillin, oxytetracycline
	Berge et al. (2006)	E. coli; tetracycline hydrochloride, neomycin sulfate
2	Aust et al. (2013)	E. coli; 25 AMs
3	Aust et al. (2013)	Enterococcus faecalis; 25 AMs
4	Duse et al. (2015)	E. coli; penicillin and aminoglycosides
5	Gonggrijp et al. (2015)	E. coli; ESBL/AmpC‐encoding genes
6	Kyselková et al. (2015)	tet (tetracycline resistance) genes by PCR
	Randall et al. (2014)	E. coli; AMs and CTX‐M encoding genes
	Brunton et al. (2014)	E. coli; cefquinome
	Aust et al. (2013)	E. coli; 25 AMs
	Pereira et al. (2014)	E. coli; ceftofur, penicillin, ampicillin, oxytetracycline
	Alali et al. (2004)	E. coli O157:H7; nalidixic acid resistant
7	Brunton et al. (2014)	E. coli; cefquinome
8	Duse et al. (2015)	E. coli; 12 AMs
	Berge et al. (2006)	E. coli; tetracycline hydrochloride, neomycin sulfate
9	Duse et al., 2015;	E. coli; 12 AMs
10	Langford et al. (2003)	Bacteria; penicillin resistance
	Pereira et al. (2014)	E. coli; ceftofur, penicillin, ampicillin, oxytetracycline
	Berge et al. (2006)	E. coli; tetracycline hydrochloride, neomycin sulfate

PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

^aThe numbers relate to the numbered summary remarks.