Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug;73(2):241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.032

Table 2.

The association between 6 independent genetic variants and liver cT1. A linear mixed model was used for genetic associations (levels of significance: p <5×10−8).

SNP CHR Base pairs EA OA EAF Gene Variant type Amino acid change BETA Standard error p value Variance explained
rs759359281 1 220,100,497 C CA 0.06 SLC30A10 Intron 0.137 0.026 2.8×10-8 0.23
rs13107325 4 103,188,709 T C 0.07 SLC39A8 Missense A391T 0.544 0.022 1.2×10-133 3.95
rs111723834 14 24,572,932 A G 0.02 PCK2, NRL Missense A561G 0.291 0.046 3.0×10-11 0.27
rs58542926 19 19,379,549 T C 0.07 TM6SF2 Missense, Intron I148M 0.124 0.022 1.4×10-8 0.22
rs4820268 22 37,469,591 G A 0.46 TMPRSS6 Missense V736A 0.066 0.012 1.6×10-9 0.2
rs738409 22 44,324,727 G C 0.21 PNPLA3 Missense E167K 0.095 0.014 9.6×10-13 0.9

Effects are in SD.

CHR, chromosome; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; OA, other allele.