TABLE 1.
Overview of several known mechanisms by which phyllosphere microbes can inhibit pathogen growth.
In vitro screening | In silico screening | Compound | Mechanism/specific activity | Identified in | References | BC | A |
1.1 Antibiotic metabolites | |||||||
Binary inhibitory interactions, purification and identification of compounds in supernatant | Screening for biosynthetic gene clusters using the antiSMASH tool | Antimicrobial secondary metabolites | Various | Various species | Helfrich et al., 2018 | X | |
srfAC, srfAD | Lipopeptide, surfactin | Triggers biofilm formation | Bacillus spp. | Chen et al., 2007; Ongena and Jacques, 2008; Dunlap et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2015 | X | ||
fenF, mycABC | Lipopeptide, iturin | Interferes with lipid layers | Bacillus spp. | Chen et al., 2007; Ongena and Jacques, 2008; Dunlap et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2015 | X | ||
ppsABCDE | Lipopeptide, fengycin | Interferes with lipid layers | Bacillus spp. | Chen et al., 2007; Ongena and Jacques, 2008; Dunlap et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2015 | X | ||
phz gene cluster, ehp gene cluster | Phenazine | Interferes with histone acetylation and biofilm formation | Pseudomonas spp., Pantoea spp. | Giddens et al., 2002; Chin-A-Woeng et al., 2003 | X | X | |
ddaA-I | Herbicolin I | Pantoea vagans C9-1 | Kamber et al., 2012 | X | |||
1.2 Hydrolytic enzymes | |||||||
Zymogram, or specific colorimetric assays | chiA, chiB, chiC or other genes encoding for glycosyl hydrolases from family 18 or 19 in the CAZy database | Hydrolytic enzymes: e.g., chitinase | Hydrolyses fungal cell wall | Bacillus subtilis | Essghaier et al., 2012 | X | |
msp1 (p75) | Bifunctional peptidoglycan hydrolase/chitinase | Inhibits hyphae formation | Lactobacillus casei group species | Allonsius et al., 2019 | X | ||
1.3 Quorum quenching and sensing | |||||||
nis gene cluster (nisin), spa gene cluster (subtilin), luxI and luxR (AHLs) | Signalling molecules. Some gr- bacteria use bacteriocins (nisin and subtilin) that also have a signalling function | Quorum sensing | Nisin in lactococcus lactis and subtilin in Bacillus subtilis | Kleerebezem, 2004 | X | ||
Screening of bacteria interfering with the transcription of a reporter gene, induced by the signalling molecule of interest | carAB (degradation signaling molecule of Xylella fastidiosa), aiiA (AHL lactonase) | Enzymes involved in degradation signalling factors | Quorum quenching | Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Microbacterium, Staphylococcus, and Pseudomonas | Newman et al., 2008; Morohoshi et al., 2009; Alymanesh et al., 2016 | X | |
1.4 Competition for nutrients and space | |||||||
Carbon source profiling and calculation of NOI | Genes related in carbohydrate metabolism (e.g., glycosyl hydrolases), or transport (e.g., Tonb receptors), using the CAZy database | Enzymes ensuring flexible carbohydrate metabolism, e.g., high diversity of TonB receptors | Increased competitiveness in a carbon limited environment | Sphingomonas spp. | Delmotte et al., 2009 | X | X |
Selective media with methanol as sole carbon source | mxaF | Conserved enzyme responsible for methanol dehydrogenase | Methylotrophy, increased adaptability in a carbon limited environment | Methylobacterium spp. | Mcdonald and Murrell, 1997 | X | |
1.5 Siderophores | |||||||
Plate assay with indicator for detection of siderophores (Chrome azurol S assay) | Screening for siderophore gene clusters, using antiSMASH | Siderophores | Primary function is iron chelation. Siderophores can also have antibacterial properties trough the production of ROS and play a role in motility on the phyllosphere | Pseudomonas protegens CS1 | Burbank et al., 2015; Santos Kron et al., 2020 | X | X |
2.1 Modulation plant hormone levels | |||||||
Colorimetric assays | iac gene cluster | Enzymes responsible for the degradation of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) | IAA is used as an energy source and modulation of IAA levels induces physiological changes in the plant | Pseudomonas putida 1290 | Leveau and Gerards, 2008 | X? | X |
HPLC analysis of extracts of the supernatant | ipdC/aldH or dcc/aldH or iaaM/iaaH or nthA | Enzymes involved in the production of IAA, several pathways possible, described in text | Modulation of IAA levels can enhance plant growth, enhanced protection against pathogens has not been demonstrated so far | P. agglomerans | Brandl et al., 2001; Duca et al., 2014; de Souza et al., 2019 | X? | X |
Cultivation with 1-aminocyclopropane-1 carboxylate as nitrogen source and by measuring production α-ketobutyrate (end-product) spectrophotometrically | acdS or accD | Enzymes responsible for lowering ethylene levels | 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, modulation of ethylene levels induces physiological changes in the plant. Enhanced protection against pathogens has not been demonstrated so far | Methylobacterium spp., R. fascians | Chinnadurai et al., 2009; Francis et al., 2016 | X? | X |
HPLC analysis of extracts of the supernatant | fas4 or IPT | Enzymes responsible for production cytokinins | Isopentenyl transferase, modulation of cytokinins levels induces physiological changes in the plant. Enhanced protection against pathogens has not been demonstrated so far | Methylobacterium spp., R. fascians | Madhaiyan et al., 2006; Francis et al., 2016; Jorge et al., 2019 | X? | X |
2.2 Induced systemic response | |||||||
Transcriptomics of the host plant | Creation of a MAMP database, compare between beneficial and pathogenic microbes | MAMPs that trigger an immune response, that increases protection against pathogens | Detection results in immune response | Sphingomonas melonis fr1 | Ryffel et al., 2016; Vogel et al., 2016 | X | X |
Transcriptomics of the host plant | Creation of an effector database, screening for type III secretion system gene clusters | effectors that trigger an immune response, that increases protection against pathogens | Detection results in immune response | Pseudomonas spp., Parabulkholderia sp. | Stringlis et al., 2019; Herpell et al., 2020 | X | X |
The table includes (i) information on in vitro assays to test for the presence of these mechanisms, (ii) known genes involved in these mechanisms (in silico screening), (iii) the compound and (iv) the mechanism resulting in antipathogenic activity, (v) microbes in which the mechanism has been identified, (vi) references and the last two columns indicate whether the mechanism is (vii) a biocontrol factor (BC) and/or (viii) an adaptation factor (A). The screening methods, strains and references are not exhaustive but rather examples, which are also discussed in the text. The table follows the same structure as the review.