Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2019 Oct 31;46(12):5637–5651. doi: 10.1002/mp.13853

Table IV.

Evaluation of the segmentation results on LVSC dataset for LV myocardium (mean values reported), obtained from all networks against the provided reference segmentation.

End diastole (ED)
End systole (ES)
SN DMR SN USN DMR USN UNet DMR UNet SN DMR SN USN DMR USN UNet DMR UNet

Dice (%) 82.2 83.0* 82.5 83.2** 83.1 83.6 83.5 84.2 83.8 84.3* 84.3 84.6
Jaccard (%) 70.0 71.1* 70.4 71.5** 71.3 72.0 71.9 72.9 72.4 73.0* 73.0 73.5
MSD (mm) 0.78 0.74 0.79 0.72* 0.74 0.70 0.81 0.77 0.77 0.78 0.74 0.75
HD (mm) 13.20 13.14 13.67 13.12 12.98 12.80 12.96 12.96 12.71* 13.71 13.08 12.51
Mass (Corr) 0.908 0.937 0.923 0.938 0.917 0.936 0.921 0.935 0.929 0.926 0.939 0.922
Mass (gram) (Bias+LOA) 2.56 (35.25) −0.92 (29.52) 3.91 (32.48) 3.34 (29.08) 2.88 (33.75) 0.06 (29.92) 5.48 (32.49) 1.96 (29.58) 5.04 (30.92) 5.49 (31.49) 5.18 (28.79) 2.56 (32.18)

The statistical significance of the results for DM regularized model compared against the baseline model are represented by * and ** for P-values < 0.05 and 0.005, respectively. The best performing model for each metric has been highlighted. SN: SegNet, USN: USegNet, UNet: UNet.

Best performing model for the ED and ES phases are shown in bold case.