Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2019 Oct 31;46(12):5637–5651. doi: 10.1002/mp.13853

Table V.

Comparison of the LV myocardium segmentation results on the LVSC validation set against the consensus segmentation (CS*) as described in.38

Method SA/FA Jaccard Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
AU47 SA 0.84 (0.17) 0.89 (0.13) 0.96 (0.06) 0.91 (0.13) 0.95 (0.06)
CNR51 SA 0.77 (0.11) 0.88 (0.09) 0.95 (0.04) 0.86 (0.11) 0.96 (0.02)
FCN9 FA 0.74 (0.13) 0.83 (0.12) 0.96 (0.03) 0.86 (0.10) 0.95 (0.03)
DFCN45 FA 0.74 (0.15) 0.84 (0.16) 0.96 (0.03) 0.87 (0.10) 0.95 (0.03)
DMR-UNet FA 0.74 (0.16) 0.85 (0.16) 0.95 (0.03) 0.86 (0.10) 0.95 (0.03)
AO48 SA 0.74 (0.16) 0.88 (0.15) 0.91 (0.06) 0.82 (0.12) 0.94 (0.06)
SCR49 FA 0.69 (0.23) 0.74 (0.23) 0.96 (0.05) 0.87 (0.16) 0.89 (0.09)
INR50 FA 0.43 (0.10) 0.89 (0.17) 0.56 (0.15) 0.50 (0.10) 0.93 (0.09)

The values for AU, AO, SCR, and INR are obtained from table II in,38 CNR from table III in Ref. [51], FCN from Table III in Ref. [9], and DFCN from table XII in Ref. [45]. Values are provided as mean (standard deviation), and in descending order by Jaccard index. SA/FA—Semi/Fully-Automatic.