Table VI.
Cross-dataset segmentation evaluation for LV myocardium segmentation (mean values reported).
| End diastole (ED) |
End systole (ES) |
|||||||||||
| SN | DMR SN | USN | DMR USN | UNet | DMR UNet | SN | DMR SN | USN | DMR USN | UNet | DMR UNet | |
| (a) Trained on ACDC and tested on LVSC (194 volumes) | ||||||||||||
| Dice(%) | 70.4 | 73.3** | 68.3 | 76.6** | 72.3 | 76.7** | 68.0 | 71.9** | 65.5 | 74.9** | 69.7 | 76.4** |
| Jaccard(%) | 55.6 | 58.9** | 53.6 | 62.9** | 58.0 | 63.1** | 53.3 | 58.1** | 50.8 | 61.5** | 55.5 | 63.1** |
| MSD(mm) | 2.68 | 2.07** | 3.33 | 1.80** | 2.46 | 1.80** | 3.56 | 2.93** | 4.19 | 2.58** | 3.49 | 2.35** |
| HD(mm) | 25.01 | 22.44** | 26.93 | 20.33** | 24.61 | 20.16** | 25.96 | 22.62** | 27.37 | 21.67** | 25.68 | 20.98** |
| End diastole (ED) |
End systole (ES) |
|||||||||||
| SN | DMR SN | USN | DMR USN | UNet | DMR UNet | SN | DMR SN | USN | DMR USN | UNet | DMR UNet | |
| (b) Trained on LVSC and tested on ACDC (200 volumes) | ||||||||||||
| Dice(%) | 69.5 | 78.4** | 62.5 | 80.1** | 62.1 | 80.2** | 57.7 | 77.6** | 51.9 | 79.3** | 50.3 | 79.1** |
| Jaccard(%) | 56.5 | 66.3** | 49.3 | 68.2** | 49.3 | 68.5** | 45.4 | 65.3** | 40.1 | 67.3** | 38.8 | 67.1** |
| MSD(mm) | 4.92 | 1.77** | 6.75 | 1.30** | 6.29 | 1.59** | 9.59 | 2.53** | 13.27 | 2.35** | 10.97 | 2.52** |
| HD(mm) | 26.04 | 17.06** | 29.08 | 13.93** | 29.50 | 14.16** | 35.13 | 19.25** | 39.60 | 18.77** | 37.44 | 19.58** |
The statistical significance of the results for DM regularized model compared against the baseline model are represented by * and ** for P-values < 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. SN: SegNet, USN: USegNet, UNet: UNet.
Best performing model for the ED and ES phases are shown in bold case.