Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2019 Oct 31;46(12):5637–5651. doi: 10.1002/mp.13853

Table VI.

Cross-dataset segmentation evaluation for LV myocardium segmentation (mean values reported).

End diastole (ED)
End systole (ES)
SN DMR SN USN DMR USN UNet DMR UNet SN DMR SN USN DMR USN UNet DMR UNet

(a) Trained on ACDC and tested on LVSC (194 volumes)
 Dice(%) 70.4 73.3** 68.3 76.6** 72.3 76.7** 68.0 71.9** 65.5 74.9** 69.7 76.4**
 Jaccard(%) 55.6 58.9** 53.6 62.9** 58.0 63.1** 53.3 58.1** 50.8 61.5** 55.5 63.1**
 MSD(mm) 2.68 2.07** 3.33 1.80** 2.46 1.80** 3.56 2.93** 4.19 2.58** 3.49 2.35**
 HD(mm) 25.01 22.44** 26.93 20.33** 24.61 20.16** 25.96 22.62** 27.37 21.67** 25.68 20.98**

End diastole (ED)
End systole (ES)
SN DMR SN USN DMR USN UNet DMR UNet SN DMR SN USN DMR USN UNet DMR UNet

(b) Trained on LVSC and tested on ACDC (200 volumes)
 Dice(%) 69.5 78.4** 62.5 80.1** 62.1 80.2** 57.7 77.6** 51.9 79.3** 50.3 79.1**
 Jaccard(%) 56.5 66.3** 49.3 68.2** 49.3 68.5** 45.4 65.3** 40.1 67.3** 38.8 67.1**
 MSD(mm) 4.92 1.77** 6.75 1.30** 6.29 1.59** 9.59 2.53** 13.27 2.35** 10.97 2.52**
 HD(mm) 26.04 17.06** 29.08 13.93** 29.50 14.16** 35.13 19.25** 39.60 18.77** 37.44 19.58**

The statistical significance of the results for DM regularized model compared against the baseline model are represented by * and ** for P-values < 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. SN: SegNet, USN: USegNet, UNet: UNet.

Best performing model for the ED and ES phases are shown in bold case.