Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 6;9(7):e925–e933. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.03.008

Table 1.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Osteotomies in the Treatment of Valgus Malalignment

MCWPTO
LOWPTO
MCWDFO
LOWDFO
Advantages Advantages Advantages Advantages
  • Effect joint contact in flexion and extension

  • No bone grafting required

  • Bone-to-bone healing

  • Early weight bearing

  • Lateral approach— access for concomitant procedures

  • Able to “fine-tune” correction

  • Bone-to-bone healing

  • Early weight bearing

  • Maintain joint line obliquity

  • Familiar surgical approach

  • Access to lateral knee for concomitant procedures

  • Able to “fine-tune” correction

Disadvantages Disadvantages Disadvantages Disadvantages
  • Separate approach needed for lateral compartment

  • Iatrogenic excessive joint line obliquity (>10°)

  • Can be difficult to “fine-tune” correction

  • Risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury

  • Fibular osteotomy may be required for larger corrections

  • Hardware irritation

  • Minimal effect on joint contact in flexion

  • Can be difficult to “fine-tune” correction

  • Minimal effect on joint contact in flexion

  • Hardware irritation

LOWDFO, lateral opening-wedge distal femur osteotomy; LOWPTO, lateral opening-wedge proximal tibia osteotomy; MCWDFO, medial closing-wedge distal femur osteotomy; MCWPTO, medial closing-wedge proximal tibia osteotomy.