Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 19;11:2151459320939550. doi: 10.1177/2151459320939550

Table 5.

Total Cost Regression in Knee and Hip Periprosthetic Fracture.

Knee Hip
Coef.
(95% CI)
Percent changea P value Coef. (95% CI) Percent changea P value
Transfer 0.151 (0.012 to 0.290) 16.3% .033b 0.116 (−0.006 to 0.237) 12.3% .061
Hospital: Urban T1 −0.002 (−0.106 to 0.103) −0.2% .974 0.087 (−0.002 to 0.176) 9.1% .054
Hospital: Ruralc 0.048 (−0.184 to 0.280) 5.0% .681 0.068 (−0.117 to 0.254) 7.1% .470
Age: 18-64d 0.022 (−0.141 to 0.184) 2.2% .792 0.039 (−0.086 to 0.164) 3.9% .544
Age: 75+d 0.046 (−0.061 to 0.153) 4.7% .399 −0.005 (−0.098 to 0.088) −0.5% .912
Comorbidity: medium (3-4)e 0.035 (−0.084 to 0.155) 3.6% .562 0.071 (−0.019 to 0.162) 7.4% .121
Comorbidity: high (5+)e 0.124 (0.000 to 0.248) 13.2% .049b 0.168 (0.054 to 0.282) 18.3% .004f
Blood product 0.154 (0.050 to 0.259) 16.7% .004f 0.107 (0.021 to 0.193) 11.3% .015b
Procedure: revision arthroplastyg 0.523 (0.413 to 0.632) 68.6% <.0001h 0.329 (0.240 to 0.418) 39.0% <.0001h

Abbreviations: Blood Product, blood Products were ordered; Transfer, transferred in from Acute Care Hospital.

a (eCoeff−1) × 100.

bP ≤ .05;

c Referent Groups: Hospital: Urban nonteaching.

d Age: 65-74.

e Comorbidity: Low (0-2).

fP ≤ .01.

g Procedure: Internal Fixation.

hP ≤ .001.