Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 May 22;130:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.05.008

Table 1.

Participant characteristics for sample used to examine effect of UCS variations on SCR conditioning (n = 135)

Participant Characteristics Factor 1: Single UCS vs. Compound UCS Factor 2:500-msec Shock vs 1000-msec Shock
Single UCS (n = 70) Compound UCS (n = 65) Comparison of two groups 500-msec Shock (n = 69) 1000-msec Shock (n = 66) Comparison of two groups
Age {Mean (SD), years} 22.9 (10.0) 23.5 (10.0) t(133) = −0.39, p = .70 23.7 (10.4) 22.7 (9.1) t(133) = 0.58, p = .56
Gender (% female, n) 54%, n = 38 65%, n = 42 χ2(1, 135) = 1.49, p = .22 61%, n = 42 58%, n = 38 χ2(1, 135) = 0.15, p = .70
Education (% completed college, n) 14%, n = 10 20%, n = 13 χ2(1, 135) = 0.78, p = .38 16%, n = 11 18%, n = 12 χ2(1, 135) = 0.12, p = .73
Ethnicity (% Hispanic, n) 4%, n = 3 11%, n = 7 Fischer’s exact p = .20 9%, n = 6 6%, n = 4 Fischer’s exact p = .74
Race (% African American, n) 6%, n = 4 3%, n = 2 Fischer’s exact p = .68 4%, n = 3 5%, n = 3 Fischer’s exact p = 1.00
Unconditioned Stimulus Intensity {Mean(SD) mA} 1.6 (0.5) 1.7 (0.4) F(1, 130) < 1, p = ns 1.6 (0.4) 1.7 (0.5) F(1, 130) < 1, p = ns