Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 May 22;130:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.05.008

Table 2.

Outcomes for effect of UCS variations on SCR conditioning (n = 135)

Outcomes Factor 1: Single UCS vs. Compound UCSa Factor 2: Short Shock vs Long Shocka
Single UCS (n = 70) Compound UCS (n = 65) Short Shock (n = 69) Long Shock (n = 66)
Primary Outcome
Acquired Differential SCR (%, n) 34%, n = 24 62%, n = 40** 51%, n = 35 44%, n = 29
Secondary Outcomes
Differential SCR {Mean(SE) μS}b 0.11(0.03) 0.18(0.03)*c 0.16(0.03) 0.13(0.03)c
• SCR to CS+ {Mean(SE) μS}b 0.53(0.04) 0.70(0.04)*** 0.68(0.04) 0.55(0.04)**
• SCR to CS− {Mean(SE) μS}b 0.42(0.03) 0.52(0.03)*c 0.52(0.03) 0.42(0.03)*c
Unconditioned SCR {Mean(SE) μS}b 1.42(0.07) 1.62(0.08)t 1.47(0.07) 1.57(0.08)

Note.

a

There were no significant interactions between Factor 1 and Factor 2;

b

Means and standard errors are based on factorial ANOVA estimated marginal means covarying for race;

c

Significance is based on Mann-Whitney U test.

t

p = .06

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001