Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;12(2):146–154. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_220_19

Table 2.

Effect of various pharmacological treatments on oxidative stress parameters in rats

Parameter Group
Vehicle control Cisplatin control (5 mg/kg, i.p.) Cisplatin + sinapic (20 mg/kg, p.o.) Cisplatin + sinapic 40 mg Cisplatin + sinapic 40mg + BADGE
TBARS (µM/mg of protein) 0.45 ± 0.04 1.55 ± 0.05a 0.75 ± 0.04b 0.58 ± 0.03b 1.28 ± 0.07c
SAG (µM/mg of tissue) 21.4 ± 0.64 65.2 ±1.39a 45.1 ± 1.24b 35.2 ± 0.86b 62.8 ± 1.38c
MPO (U/g of tissue) 1.79 ± 0.52 6.91 ± 0.91a 5.02 ± 2.31b 2.06 ± 0.63b 5.24 ± 0.96c
GSH (mM/mg of protein) 16.2 ± 0.41 5.35 ± 0.52a 12.65 ± 0.52b 14.18 ± 0.33b 7.82 ± 0.64c

TBARS = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, SAG = superoxide anion generation, MPO = myeloperoxidase, GSH = glutathione, BADGE = bisphenol A diglycidyl ether, i.p. = intraperitoneal, p.o. = orally

Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (n = 6)

aP < 0.05 versus vehicle control group

bP < 0.05 versus cisplatin (5 mg/kg, i.p.)

cP < 0.05 versus cisplatin + sinapic acid (40 mg/kg, p.o.)