Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;22(4):90. doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00471-y

Table I.

Models Used for Numerical Experiments

Model Reference Model classification Fixed effects Random effects Residual error Number of subjects Number of samples Comment
A Jönsson et al. (18) Two-comp. PK 7 2 Additive 177 1196 Closed form
B Bergmann et al. (19) Two-comp. PK 10 3 Additive and proportional 93 274 Closed form
C Wählby et al. (20) Two-comp. PK, transit comp. power PD 7 4 Additive and proportional 47 530 ODEs
D Grasela and Donn (21) One-comp. PK, 3 3 Proportional 59 155 Closed form
E Practically non-identifiable Emax model. 8 5 Additive and proportional 326 1803 ED50 and γ cannot both be estimated on sim. Data
F Non-identifiable example from Aoki et al. (22) Structurally non-identifiable two-comp. PK w/ fraction of dose data 4 3 Proportional 25 612 V1, Q, V2, and CL cannot all be estimated

Comp., compartment; DEs, differential equations; γ, hill factor for Emax model; ED50, dose required for half effect; V1, volume of central compartment; V2, volume of peripheral compartment; Q, intercompartmental clearance; CL, clearance