Table 1.
Stage | T-level | LN status | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative | |||||
II | 31 | uT2 | 2 | N+ | 2 |
uT3 | 90 | N− | 31 | ||
III | 63 | N+ | 59 | ||
uT4 | 2 | N+ | 2 | ||
Postoperative | |||||
0 | 11 | pT0 | 13 | N− | 11 |
N+ | 2 | ||||
I | 32 | pT1 | 13 | N− | 2 |
N+ | 11 | ||||
II | 20 | pT2 | 24 | N− | 3 |
N+ | 21 | ||||
III | 28 | pT3 | 37 | N− | 17 |
N+ | 20 | ||||
IV | 3 | pT4 | 7 | N− | 3 |
N+ | 4 | ||||
T-level downsizing | Downstaging | ||||
Yes | 51 | 57 | |||
No | 43 | 37 | |||
Tumor regression gradinga | |||||
TRG 0 | 1 | ||||
TRG 1 | 12 | ||||
TRG 2 | 30 | ||||
TRG 3 | 38 | ||||
TRG 4 | 12 |
For one case tumor regression grading was not assessable.