Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;15(7):e0236193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236193

Table 1. Association of the HCN4 variant with outcomes in the UK Biobank using prospective and cause-specific hazard competing risk analyses.

Outcome Model N total N events HR (95% CI) * P-value
Genetic model for SHIFT**
Using participants without a history of atrial fibrillation or heart failure at recruitment
Heart failure Cox proportional-hazards 404,767 3,385 0.96 (0.89, 1.02) 0.18
Atrial fibrillation Cox proportional-hazards 404,767 8,461 1.08 (1.04, 1.13) 9.4 × 10−5
Heart failure Competing risk (atrial fibrillation) 404,767 2,380 0.90 (0.83, 0.98) 0.013
Atrial fibrillation Competing risk (heart failure) 404,767 7,663 1.08 (1.04, 1.13) 3.2 × 10−4
Genetic model for SIGNIFY**
Using participants without a history of atrial fibrillation or MI at recruitment
MI or CV Death Cox proportional-hazards 397,008 4,976 0.99 (0.94, 1.05) 0.84
Atrial fibrillation Cox proportional-hazards 397,008 7,880 1.08 (1.04, 1.13) 3.1 × 10−4
MI or CV Death Competing risk (atrial fibrillation) 397,008 4,534 0.99 (0.93, 1.04) 0.61
Atrial fibrillation Competing risk (MI or CV death) 397,008 7,482 1.09 (1.04, 1.13) 1.4 × 10−4

* Reporting the effect of the heart rate reducing allele of rs8038766 at the HCN4 gene. All models were adjusted for age, sex and the first 10 principal components. In the Cox proportional-hazards models, individuals were censored at the time of death or end of follow up; in the competing risk models, individuals were censored at the time of occurrence of the competing event, death, or end of follow up.

** Our model aims to match the outcome and exposure of interest from the SHIFT and SIGNIFY trials, but we did not emulate the trials in any other way such as by matching the inclusion / exclusion criteria.

CV, cardiovascular; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction.