Table 4:
Characteristics of CMV retinitis, stratified by the most posterior zone involved and by telemedicine results
Detected on photographya (True positives) | Not detected on photographya (False negatives) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Most posterior zone | Most posterior zone | ||||
Zone 1 (N=4) | Zone 2 (N=2) | Zone 1 (N=2) | Zone 2 (N=6) | Zone 3 (N=7) | |
Lesion Size | |||||
<10% | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 4 (66.6%) | 7 (100%) |
10%−24% | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) |
25%−50% | 2 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) |
>50% | 2 (50.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Border Opacity | |||||
1+ | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 (33.3%) | 5 (71.4%) |
2+ | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (50.0%) | 2 (28.6%) |
3+ | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) |
4+ | 4 (100%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Results stratified by the consensus grade given by at least 2 of 3 remote graders