Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;252:490–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.034

Table 3.

Heterogeneity assessment.

N I2 P(%) 95 %CI
C-section
Location
China 14 79.35 % 0.88 0.73 0.98
USA 4 43.30 % 0.48 0.31 0.65
Europe 6 62.22 % 0.44 0.32 0.57
Sample size
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome < = 10 11 87.52 % 0.80 0.54 0.98
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome >10 14 83.12 % 0.66 0.51 0.80
Preterm
Location
China 14 46.99 % 0.20 0.12 0.30
USA 4 71.90 % 0.20 0.04 0.43
Europe 6 74.55% 0.24 0.12 0.39
Sample size
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome < = 10 10 70.12 % 0.33 0.15 0.54
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome >10 15 53.56 % 0.19 0.13 0.26
Adverse pregnancy events
Location
China 14 65.47 % 0.25 0.14 0.37
USA 4 80.69 % 0.26 0.05 0.54
Europe 6 77.96 % 0.25 0.12 0.41
Sample size
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome < = 10 10 78.23 % 0.39 0.17 0.64
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome >10 15 63.32 % 0.22 0.15 0.29
Low birth weight
Location
China 12 65.86 % 0.07 0.01 0.16
USA 2 NA 0.00 0.00 0.13
Europe 3 NA 0.02 0.00 0.15
Sample size
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome < = 10 9 76.18 % 0.14 0.01 0.36
Sample size of studies with pregnancy outcome >10 9 43.53 % 0.03 0.00 0.08

P: proportion; CI: confidence interval; I2: measures of heterogeneity across studies; NA: not applicable.