Table 4.
T1 | T2 | T3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
My Guide (n=39) | My Health (n=39) | p-value | My Guide (n=37) | My Health (n=38) | p-value | My Guide (n=37) | My Health (n=36) | p-value | |
Daily nutrition intake | |||||||||
Fat sources; EMM (SE) | 2.38 (0.21) | 2.86 (0.21) | 0.106 | 2.42 (0.22) | 2.38 (0.21) | 0.892 | 2.36 (0.22) | 2.20 (0.22) | 0.607 |
Fruit/vegetable servings; EMM (SE) | 3.48 (0.27) | 3.80 (0.27) | 0.397 | 3.41 (0.28) | 3.53 (0.28) | 0.883 | 3.26 (0.28) | 3.59 (0.28) | 0.399 |
Weekly physical activity in MET minutes | |||||||||
Walking; GM [95% CI] | 161 [116, 304] | 144 [76, 271] | 0.775 | 301 [218, 567] | 281 [149, 529] | 0.883 | 262 [190, 494] | 203 [108, 383] | 0.572 |
Moderate PA; GM [95% CI] | 9 [5, 25] | 5 [1, 15] | 0.515 | 12 [7, 35] | 7 [2, 21] | 0.521 | 11 [6, 32] | 6 [1, 17] | 0.415 |
Vigorous PA; GM [95% CI] | 4 [2, 11] | 3 [1, 10] | 0.888 | 2 [1, 7] | 4 [1, 12] | 0.403 | 5 [3, 15] | 2 [0, 6] | 0.225 |
Weekly physical activity in minutes | |||||||||
Walking; GM [95% CI] | 49 [35, 92] | 44 [23, 82] | 0.807 | 91 [66, 172] | 85 [45, 160] | 0.858 | 79 [58, 150] | 62 [33, 116] | 0.571 |
Moderate PA; GM [95% CI] | 2 [1, 6] | 1 [0, 4] | 0.542 | 3 [2, 9] | 2 [1, 5] | 0.510 | 3 [2, 8] | 2 [0, 4] | 0.406 |
Vigorous PA; GM [95% CI] | 1 [0, 1] | 0 [0, 1] | 0.857 | 0 [0, 1] | 1 [0, 2] | 0.396 | 1 [0, 2] | 0 [0, 1] | 0.248 |
Daily sitting in simple minutes; EMM (SE) | 232 (25) | 240 (25) | 0.809 | 215 (26) | 212 (26) | 0.939 | 208 (26) | 224 (26) | 0.657 |
Physical activity categorization | 0.898 | 0.914 | 0.591 | ||||||
Minimally active; n (%) | 20 (51) | 22 (56) | 20 (54) | 19 (50) | 20 (56) | 21 (58) | |||
Moderately active; n (%) | 12 (31) | 11 (28) | 11 (30) | 13 (34) | 14 (39) | 11 (31) | |||
Highly active; n (%) | 7 (18) | 6 (15) | 6 (16) | 6 (16) | 2 (6) | 4 (11) |
Note. Cl, confidence interval; EMM, estimated marginal mean; GM, geometric mean; MET, metabolic equivalent; n, frequency; PA, physical activity; SE, standard error; T1, study baseline; T2, immediately post-intervention; T3, two weeks post-T2. p-values reflect comparisons between study conditions at each time point. Means for physical activity were back-transformed from log(x+1) values.