Table 6.
Effect of NPs surface charge on tumor uptake: it seems that positively charged NPs and slightly negative display a good tumor uptake.
| Authors | Nanoparticle types and charge | Treatment/study | Efficacy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xiao et al. [44] | NPs with high negative and high positive charge | Tumor cellular uptake | High uptake of slight negative and slight positive NPs |
| Gou et al. [111] | NPs with different charge | Tumor cell uptake | Delayed charge reversal strategy could improve therapeutic effect |
| Graf et al. [112] | High positive NPs | Stability in physiological media | Effective cellular internalization |
| He et al. [45] | Polymeric NPs negative(−40 mV) and positive charge (+35 mV) | Tumor uptake | Slight negative charge accumulate more efficiently in tumor |
| Chen et al. [113] | Positive and negative NPs | Tumor uptake | High uptake of positively charged Nps increase uptake of both charge under hypoxic conditions |
| Stylianopoulos et al. [105] | Positive NPs switched into neutral inside the tumor | Cancer (tumor targeting) | Positive NPs: Effective tumor targeting & neutral charge allowed quicker diffusion of the nanoparticles to the tumor tissue |