Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 27;20(13):3617. doi: 10.3390/s20133617

Table 4.

Comparison of calibration performance by input variables (short-term: 80%—training dataset, 20%—test dataset, shuffled method, 5 min. sampling interval condition).

Input Variables Linear - ULR/MLR Nonlinear - MLP
MAE MSE R2 MAE MSE R2
[uncalibrated] Raw PM 9.78 216.89 0.52 9.78 216.89 0.52
[ calibrated] Raw PM 3.69 24.44 0.78 3.55 23.12 0.80
[ calibrated] Raw PM + Humidity 3.11 18.72 0.84 2.99 16.69 0.84
[ calibrated] Raw PM + Temp 3.22 19.56 0.83 3.11 18.39 0.83
[ calibrated] Raw PM + Light 3.39 21.40 0.81 3.23 18.97 0.84
[ calibrated] Raw PM + Humidity + Temp 3.11 18.70 0.84 2.95 16.91 0.83
[ calibrated] Raw PM + Humidity + Light 3.09 18.61 0.84 2.99 17.01 0.83
[ calibrated] Raw PM + Temp + Light 3.19 19.25 0.83 3.10 18.15 0.83
[ calibrated] Raw PM + Humidity + Temp + Light 3.08 18.41 0.84 2.93 16.76 0.83