Table 1.
Similarities and differences between MN and concept acquisition through meta-learning (CAML).
| MN | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-training goals | The goal is to give the network the ability to measure the similarity between two samples. | The goal is to make CAML learn the optimal initialization by updating on different tasks. |
| Need fine-tuning | MN can achieve classification tasks without fine-tuning, but the values generated after fine-tuning are more accurate. | Yes |
| Fine-tuning process | MN predicts new samples, and the error between the predicted value and the label is used to update the network parameters. | CAML updates parameters by one or a few steps of gradient descent with a few positive examples from the new task. |