Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;20(13):3710. doi: 10.3390/s20133710

Table 7.

Results of the ablation study with the combined segmentation on the test data set: For this evaluation, a reduced image resolution of 320 × 256 pixels was used. The results highlight the marginal impact of the different architecture choices (U-Net vs. Feature Pyramid Network (FPN)) as well as the different backbones.

Combined U-Net PQ F1 Precision Recall Cat. Acc
ResNet34 0.7863 0.9457 0.9559 0.9358 0.9694
Incep.-RN-v2 0.7685 0.9326 0.9501 0.9157 0.9674
EfficientNet-B5 0.7768 0.9404 0.9471 0.9337 0.9692
Combined FPN PQ F1 Precision Recall Cat. Acc
ResNet34 0.7824 0.9442 0.9556 0.9332 0.9709
Incep.-RN-v2 0.7784 0.9414 0.9511 0.9319 0.9700
EfficientNet-B5 0.7861 0.9451 0.9556 0.9347 0.9709