Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 4;6(2):75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.04.002

Table 1.

Correlation between bone mineral density magnitude and factors of all subjects in each part with P-value.

Factor Population or mean value LS FN TH GT
Being RA patient 323 (43.6) 0.126 0.001 0.001 0.003
Age 79.2 ± 10.2 0.216 0.792 0.330 0.021
Being male 72 (9.7) 0.136 0.356 0.151 0.001
Current GCS administration 42 (5.7) 0.099 0.315 0.629 0.357
Current GCS dose, mg/day 3.5 ± 2.6 0.084 0.078 0.037 0.003
GCS administrated 228 (30.8) 0.366 0.732 0.752 0.305
Mean cumulative GCS dose, mg 203.8 ± 604.7 0.129 0.603 0.853 0.554
Osteoporosis drug intervention 522 (70.4) 0.527 0.001 0.001 0.001
Past bone fragility fracture 223 (30.1) 0.914 0.276 0.443 0.934
Frailty score 2.4 ± 2.3 0.224 0.212 0.311 0.152
Barthel Index 70.1 ± 25.8 0.985 0.401 0.015 0.156
Body mass index 21.9 ± 10.2 0.005 0.231 0.049 0.006
Cr/CysC 0.661 ± 0.134 0.316 0.104 0.852 0.554
Dementia treated 205 (27.5) 0.723 0.545 0.642 0.504
No. of comorbidities 11.4 ± 6.2 0.001 0.553 0.929 0.925

Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

LS, lumbar spine; FN, femoral neck; TH, total hip; GT, greater trochanter; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; GCS, glucocorticoid steroid; Cr/CysC, serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio.

In LS, FN, TH, and GT columns, P-value with multiple linear regression analysis are shown.

Plain style shows positive correlation and italic style shows negative correlation.

Bold style with large points shows significant positive correlation (P < 0.05), and bold style with large points and with underline shows significant negative correlation (P < 0.05). Small pointed number shows no significant correlation (P > 0.05).