Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;10:244. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00919-x

Table 2.

Detailed characteristics of cross-sectional studies (n = 34).

Authors’ and publication year Country Research centre/Cohort Participants Assessment tool Method of calculating score Method of clustering Number, label and distribution of clusters (n/%) Significant correlates of clustersa
Positive symptoms
Chang 201583 Korea Seoul National University Hospital and Boramae Medical Center 111 patients with schizophrenia LSHS-R Sum score Ward’s cluster analysis Three: perception dimension and perception-cognition dimension (cluster 2 and 3) Not reported.
Negative symptoms
Strauss et al. 201385 USA Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System 199 patients with schizophrenia SANS Mean factor scores (PCA) Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Three: diminished expression (41/20.6), avolition–apathy (85/42.7) and low negative symptoms (75/37.7) General psychopathology, severity of positive and negative symptoms, social anhedonia, attitude, global functioning, social cognition, hospitalization
Ahmed 201815 USA Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC) 706 patients with chronic schizophrenia SDS Sum score Latent class analysis with prior hypothesis Three: deficit (128/19.3), persistent (174/25.1) and transient (404/55.6) Sex, season of birth, ethnicity, years of education, illness onset, positive symptoms, neurocognitive performance, premorbid adjustment, psychosocial functioning
Positive and negative symptoms
Trauelsen et al. 201669 Denmark OPUS 97 patients with first-episode non-affective psychosis and 101 controls PANSS Z-scores K-means cluster analysis Four: low positive and negative symptoms (39/40.2), high positive and low negative (15/15.5), low positive and high negative (16/16.5), and high positive and high negative (24/24.7) Metacognition
Talpalaru et al. 201977 Multinational North-western University Schizophrenia Data and Software Tool (NUSDAST) dataset 104 patients with schizophrenia and 63 healthy controls SAPS, SANS Z-scores Ward’s cluster analysis

Three: high positive and negative symptom (27/26.0), predominantly

positive symptom (36/34.6), and low symptom (41/39.4)

Gender
Craddock 201821 USA National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)/Childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) cohort 125 patients with childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) SAPS, SANS Factor score (CFA) K-means cluster analysis Three: low positive and negative (37/29.6), high negative low positive (33/26.4), and high positive and negative (55/44.0) IQ, global functioning, positive and negative symptoms
Cognitive deficits
Dawes 201188 USA University of California/San Diego (UCSD) Advanced Center for Innovation in Services and Interventions Research (ACISIR) 144 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder Comprehensive neuropsychological test battery (7 tests) Sum of deviation scores adjusted to age, gender, education and ethnicity Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Five: low visual learning and memory (19/13.2), low auditory and visual learning, memory and abstraction/cognitive flexibility (38/26.4), low abstraction/cognitive flexibility (40/27.8), low auditory learning, memory and abstraction/cognitive flexibility (17/11.8), and low visual learning, memory and abstraction/cognitive flexibility (30/20.8) Educational status, ethnicity
Lewandowski 201887 USA McLean Hospital/Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Program (SBDP) 120 patients with psychosis and 31 healthy controls MCCB (10 subtests) Age and gender adjusted T-scores Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Four: normal (39/32.5), mildly impaired (42/35.0), moderately impaired (18/15.0) and significantly impaired (21/17.5) Educational status, premorbid IQ, state mania, positive and negative symptoms, antipsychotic dosage, cognition, community functioning
Reser et al. 201586 Australia Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) 128 patients with a first-episode psychosis Comprehensive cognitive battery test (15 tests) Range standardized test scores Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Four: poor visual recognition memory (26/20.3), flat profile (46/35.9), strong performance (25/19.5) and poor performance (31/24.2) Age, IQ (premorbid and current), years of education, negative symptoms, neurocognitive performance
Geisler 201575 USA Four research centers (MGH, UI, UMN, UNM)/Mind Clinical Imaging Consortium (MCIC) study of schizophrenia 129 patients with schizophrenia and 165 healthy controls Comprehensive neuropsychological test battery (18 tests) PC score (PCA) K-means cluster analysis Four: diminished verbal fluency (38/29.4), diminished verbal memory and poor motor control (26/20.2), diminished face memory and slowed processing (21/16.3), and diminished intellectual function (44/34.1) Duration of illness, positive symptoms, years of education, premorbid adjustment, cortical thickness, neural activity
Rangel et al. 201591 Colombia Universities of Antioquia, Pontificia Bolivariana, Nacional of Colombia 253 patients with schizophrenia Neuropsychological tests (5 tests) Not reported Latent classes analysis Four: global cognitive deficit (74/29.2), memory and executive function deficit (75/29.6), memory and facial emotion recognition deficit (60/23.7), and without cognitive deficit (44/17.4) Gender, age, negative symptoms, global functioning, employment status, adherence to treatment, neurocognitive performance, depression
Lewandowski 201418 USA McLean Hospital/Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Program (SBDP) 167 patients with psychosis Neuropsychological battery test (5 tests) Z-scores adjusted to age or age and education Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Four: globally normal (46/27.5), normal processing speed/executive function (42/25.1), normal visuospatial function (35/21.0) and globally impaired (44/26.3) Cognition, age, educational attainment, antipsychotics dosage, positive and negative symptoms, community functioning
Dickinson et al. 201992 USA National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Center 540 schizophrenia patients, 247 unaffected siblings, and 844 control subjects WRAT, WAIS IQ Average of z-scores (based on controls mean and SD) Two-step Cluster analysis Three: cognitively stable (198/37), preadolescent impairment (105/19) and adolescent decline (237/44) Polygenic risk scores (schizophrenia, cognition, education, ADHD), educational status, employment, positive and negative symptoms, global functioning, cognitive performance
Smucny et al. 201990 USA CNTRACS consortium 223 psychosis patients and 73 healthy controls Neuropsychological tests (3 tests) Z-score and Factor score Latent profile analysis (LPA) Three: low (15/6.7), moderate (66/29.6) and high (142/63.7) Negative, positive, disorganization, mania, and depressed mood symptoms, functioning, educational status, neurocognitive perfomance
Crouse et al. 201881 Australia Brain and Mind Research Institute 135 patients with a psychosis-spectrum illness and 50 healthy controls CANTAB (9 tests) Age-adjusted Z-scores Ward’s cluster analysis Three: normal-range (46/34.0), mixed (58/43.0) and grossly impaired (31/23.0) Socio-occupational functioning, neurocognitive performance, gender, diagnosis, risky drinking, employment status, educational status, premorbid IQ, negative symptoms
Sauve et al. 201838 Canada Douglas Mental Health University Institute (DMHUI)/ PEPP-Montreal program 201 patients with psychosis on treatment and 125 healthy controls CogState Schizophrenia Battery (13 tests) Composite scores standardized to controls Ward’s and K-means cluster analyses Three: no impairment (169/51.8), generally impaired (39/12.0) and intermediately impaired (118/36.2) IQ, severity of positive symptoms, age, years of education, stage of illness, antipsychotics dosage
Bechi 201893 Italy IRCCS San Raffael Scientific Institute 452 patients with stable schizophrenia BACS, WAIS-R Mean score adjusted to age and education Two-step cluster analysis (both scores together) Three: high (135/29.9), medium (173/38.3) and low (144/31.8) (for all sample) Age, years of education, age of onset, negative and positive symptoms, IQ, cognition
Uren et al. 201784 Australia Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) 133 patients with first episode psychosis and 46 controls Comprehensive battery test (14 tests) Z-scores Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Three: severe global impairment (24/13.4), moderate impairment (73/40.8) and intact (82/45.8) Age, premorbid IQ, positive and negative symptoms, cognitive performance, years of education, functioning
Ohi et al. 201753 Japan Kanazawa Medical University Hospital/ Kanazawa Medical University 81 patients with schizophrenia, 20 relatives and 25 healthy controls BACS (6 subscales) Age- and gender-corrected raw scores K-means cluster analysis Three: neuropsychologically normal (36/28.6), intermediately impaired (60/47.6) and globally impaired (30/23.8) Clinical diagnosis, neurocognitive performance, years of education, premorbid IQ, antipsychotics dosage
Prouteau et al. 201780 France Public psychiatric hospitals 69 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Objective: Neuropsychological tests (6 tests)

Subjective: SSTICS

Standardized Z-scores Ward’s cluster analysis Three: high cognitive impairment/moderate cognitive complaints (26/37.7), good cognitive functioning/moderate cognitive complaints (22/31.9) and moderate cognitive impairment/high cognitive complaints (21/30.4) Age, educational status, negative symptoms, quality of life, anxiety, depression, stigma, neurocognitive performance
Rodrigez et al. 201779 Czech National Institute of Mental Health 28 patients with first-episode SSD and 91 healthy controls Neuropsychological battery tests (15 tests) Z-scores standardized using controls Ward’s cluster analysis Three: generalized severe (10/35.7), partial mild (7/25.0) and near normal (11/39.3) Neurocognitive performance
Rocca et al. 201694 Italy Multicentre study/Italian Network for Research on Psychoses (NIRP) 809 patients with schizophrenia and 780 controls MCCB (3 tests) Z-scores of scales Two-step cluster analysis Three: unimpaired (340/42), impaired (408/50.4) and very impaired (61/7.5) Age, educational status, cognitive performance, functioning, positive and negative symptoms, disorganization
Wells et al. 201595 Australia Australian Schizophrenia Research Bank (ASRB) 534 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 635 healthy controls Neuropsychological tests (5 tests) Z-scores standardized by healthy controls Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis, and clinical method Three: preserved (157/29), deteriorated (239/44) and compromised (138/26) Age, years of education, age onset of illness, gender, neurocognitive performance, positive and negative symptoms, functioning
Gilbert 201482 Canada Institut en santé mentale de Québec 112 patients with schizophrenia Cognitive battery test (> 8 tests) Average Z-scores Ward’s cluster analysis Three: generally impaired (18/16.1), selectively impaired (46/41.1) and near normal (48/42.8) IQ, gender, socioeconomic status, cognition, antipsychotics dosage, global functioning, positive and negative symptoms
Quee et al. 201454 Netherlands Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) 654 health siblings of patients with schizophrenia Neuropsychological battery test (8 tests) Mean score of gender and age-adjusted z-scores Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Three: normal (192/29.4), mixed (228/34.8) and impaired (234/35.8) Age, educational status, IQ, premorbid adjustment, positive schizotypy
Ochoa et al. 201371 Spain Hospital and community psychiatric services 62 patients with a first-episode psychosis Neuropsychological battery tests (5 tests) Demographically adjusted score K-means cluster analysis Three: higher neurodevelopment contribution (14/22.6), higher genetic contribution (30/48.4) and lower neurodevelopment contribution (18/29.0) Neurocognition performance, premorbid IQ, neurological soft signs, premorbid adjustment, family history of mental disorders, obstetric complications
Bell 201076 USA Community mental health center (CMHC) 151 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (stable) HVLT-R Sum score K-means cluster analysis (with prior hypothesis) Three: nearly normal (52/34.4), subcortical (68/45.0) and cortical (31/20.5) Educational status, neurocognitive performance, social cognition
Potter et al. 201070 USA University of Massachusetts 73 patients with schizophrenia and 74 controls Neuropsychological tests (6 tests) Scaled scores K-means cluster analysis Three: intellectually compromised (31/42), intellectually deteriorated 21(/29) and intellectually preserved (21/29) Negative symptoms, neurocognitive performance, educational status, general psychopathology
Wu et al. 201078 Taiwan Psychiatric rehabilitation hospital 76 patients with schizophrenia BNCE (10 subscales) Mean scores Ward’s cluster analysis Three: near normal (34/45), deteriorated conceptual thinking (20/26), and anomia and impaired executive function (22/29) Severity of negative symptoms
Bechi 201893 Italy IRCCS San Raffael Scientific Institute 52 patients with stable schizophrenia BACS, WAIS-R Sum score Two-step cluster analysis (both scores together) Two: high (30/57.7) and medium (22/42.3) (subsamples with high pre-morbid IQ) Age, years of education, age of onset, negative and positive symptoms, IQ, cognition
Negative symptoms and cognitive deficits
Lysaker et al. 200974 USA Roudebush VA Medical Center and Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) 99 patients with stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and on treatment PANSS, CPT Normalized z-scores K-means cluster analysis Four: low negative/relatively better attention (31/31.3), low negative/relatively poor attention (20/20.2), high negative/ relatively poor attention (28/28.3), and high negative/relatively better attention (20/20.2) Self-esteem, attention performance, acceptance of stigma, severity of positive and negative symptoms, social functioning
Bell 201389 USA Community mental health center (CMHC) 77 outpatients with stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder SANS, PANSS, MSCEIT Sum score Ward’s and K-means cluster analysis Three: high negative symptom (24/31.2), low negative symptom with higher social cognition (27/35.1), and low negative symptom with poorer social cognition (26/33.7) Quality of life, hospitalization, marital status, negative symptoms, social cognition
Schizotypy
Lui et al. 201855 China Castle Peak Hospital 194 unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia CPPS (4 subscales) Sum score K-means cluster analysis Four: high positive (33/17.0), high negative (66/34.0), mixed (27/13.9) and low (64/32.9) schizotypy Positive and negative schizotypy, everyday life pleasure experiences, emotional expressivity
Wang et al. 201272 China Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory 418 healthy college students CPPS Normalized component score (PCA) K-means cluster analysis Four: low (148/35.4), high positive (71/17.0), high negative (116/27.7), and mixed (high positive and negative) (83/19.9) schizotypy Psychotic-like symptoms, depression, and social function, emotional expression, pleasure experiences, somatic symptoms, neurocognitive functioning, proneness to positive and negative symptoms
Barrantes-Vidal et al. 201073 USA University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG) 6,137 healthy college students CPPS Normalized component score (PCA) K-means cluster analysis Four: low (2,137/35), high positive (1,895/31), high negative (1,352/22), and mixed (high positive and negative) (753/12) schizotypy Severity of positive and negative schizotypy, gender, social functioning, psychotic-like experiences, depression, substance use and abuse, schizoid and negative symptoms, personality, social adjustment
Chang 201583 Korea Seoul National University Hospital and Boramae Medical Center 223 nonclinical population LSHS-R Sum score Ward’s cluster analysis Two: Perception dimension and Cognitive dimension Not reported.

BACS Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, BNCE Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination, CANTAB Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, CPPS Chapman Psychosis Proneness Scales, CPT Continuous Performance Tests, HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—revised, LSHS-R Launay–Slade Hallucination Scale—revised, MCCB MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, MSCEIT Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, SANS Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, SAPS Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, SDS Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome, SSD Schizophrenia spectrum disorder, SSTICS Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia, WAIS-R Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—revised, WRAT Wide-Range Achievement Test.

aResults from pairwise comparisons, univariable or multivariable logistic regression analyses.