Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2019 Dec 6;158(3):705–731.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.001

Table 1:

PICO questions, outcomes, and evidence needed to inform PICO questions

PICO Question Patient-Important Outcomes Evidence needed to inform PICO questions
1. Among patients with GIM, does testing for H. pylori and treating if positive vs no testing affect outcomes? Early cancer detection

Reduced gastric cancer morbidity/mortality

Endoscopy complications

Costs

Psychological harms
1. Incidence and prevalence of GIM in the US population
2. Incidence of stomach cancer in the general population
3. Prevalence of concurrent stomach cancer in patients with GIM
4. Incidence of stomach cancer in patients with GIM after GIM diagnosis
5. Risk of progression to gastric cancer in patients with GIM
Subgroups: Family history of gastric cancer, Race/Ethnicity, smoking status, histologic features, extent of GIM, biomarkers.
6. Potential adverse consequences of performing surveillance upper endoscopy for patients with GIM
7. Benefits of performing surveillance upper endoscopy for patients with GIM
2. Among patients with GIM who are identified as low risk, does subsequent upper endoscopic surveillance vs no follow up affect outcomes?
3. Among patients with GIM who are identified as high risk, does subsequent upper endoscopic surveillance vs no follow up affect outcomes?
4. Among patients with GIM without dysplasia does short term upper endoscopic follow up (< 1 year) to determine the extent (using biopsies) of GIM vs no short term follow up affect outcomes?