Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2019 Dec 6;158(3):705–731.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.001

Table 4:

Evidence profile and pooled effect estimates to inform PICO questions 2–4

Outcome Estimate (95% CI) Certainty of Evidence Risk of Bias Inconsistency Imprecision Indirectness
Incidence rate of any dysplasia in patients with GIM 97.6/10,000 p-y (77.3 – 120.0) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Not serious Serious Not serious Serious
Cumulative incidence of any dysplasia in patients with GIM at 3 years 15.0% (13.2 – 16.8) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Serious Not serious Serious
at 5 years 15.0% (13.2 – 17.0) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Not serious Serious Not serious Serious
Cumulative incidence of HGD or gastric cancer in patients with GIM at 5 years 2.7% (1.8 – 3.8) ⊕○○○
Very low
Not serious Not serious Very serious Serious
Incidence rate of gastric cancer in patients with GIM all geographies 12.4/10,000 p-y (10.7 – 14.3) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Serious1 Serious1 Not serious Serious
US geography only 8.2/10,000 p-y (5.1 – 12.0) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Serious Not serious Serious Not serious
Cumulative incidence of gastric cancer in patients with GIM within 1 year 0.5% (0.4 – 0.6) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Serious Not serious Not serious Serious
at 3 years 0.4% (0.1 – 0.8) ⊕○○○
Very low
Not serious Not serious Very serious Serious
at 5 years 1.1% (1.0 – 1.2) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Serious Not serious Not serious Serious
at 10 years 1.6% (1.5 – 1.7) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Serious Not serious Serious
Cumulative incidence of gastric cancer in patients with GIM based on race/ethnicity Asian 0.3% (0.1 – 0.8) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
Black 0.4% (0.0 – 1.4) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
Hispanic 1.0% (0.4 – 1.7) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
White 0.3% (0.1 – 0.6) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
Other 0.1% (0.0 – 0.9) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
Relative risk of incident gastric cancer in patients with GIM and first degree family history of gastric cancer vs. no first degree family history 4.5 (1.3 – 15.5) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
Relative risk of incident gastric cancer in patients with incomplete vs. complete GIM on histology 3.3 (2.0 – 5.6) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Not serious Not serious Serious Serious
Relative risk of incident gastric dysplasia in patients with incomplete vs. complete GIM on histology 1.7 (0.8 – 3.7) ⊕⊕○○
Low
Not serious Not serious Serious2 Serious
Relative risk of incident gastric cancer in patients with extensive vs. limited GIM 2.1 (1.0 – 4.4) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
Relative risk of incident gastric cancer in patients with GIM who smoke(d) tobacco vs. none smokers 1.0 (0.3 – 4.1) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Very serious Not serious
Cumulative risk of GIM regression to improved global histology at 1 year 29.7% (24.5 – 35.2) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Not serious Serious Serious
at 3 years 19.4% (17.4 – 21.4) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Serious Not serious Serious
at 5 years 25.9% (23.7 – 28.2) ⊕○○○
Very low
Serious Serious Not serious Serious
1

we rated down one level only for both risk of bias (few studies lacked protocolized biopsies) and inconsistency (most of the evidence was consistent except two small studies) together.

2

despite the narrow confidence interval, we elected to rate down for imprecision due to the small number of events.

Abbreviations: GIM, gastric intestinal metaplasia; HGD, high grade dysplasia.