Table 1.
Digital Mammography (2D) | Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (with synthetic 2D) | Rate Ratio (95% CI)b | |
---|---|---|---|
Cancers detected at screening | |||
All screening examinations Number of detected BCs [N screens in analysis]; CDR per 1000 screens |
205 [37,436 screens] 5.48/1000 |
402a [46,343 screens] 8.67/1000 |
1.58 (1.34–1.87) |
First (prevalent) screening round Number of detected BCs [N screens in analysis]; CDR per 1000 screens |
38 [6,412 screens] 5.93/1000 |
74 [8,569 screens] 8.64/1000 |
1.46 (0.99–2.15) |
Repeat (incident) screening round Number of detected BCs [N screens in analysis]; CDR per 1000 screens |
167 [31,024 screens] 5.38/1000 |
328a [37,774 screens] 8.68/1000 |
1.61 (1.34–1.94) |
Recall for further assessment | |||
All screening examinations Number of recalls [N screens in analysis]; recall percentage |
1,201 [37,436 screens] 3.21% |
1,180 [46,343 screens] 2.55% |
0.79 (0.73–0.86) |
First (prevalent) screening round Number of recalls [N screens in analysis]; recall percentage |
477 [6,412 screens] 7.44% |
331 [8,569 screens] 3.86% |
0.52 (0.45–0.60) |
Repeat (incident) screening round Number of recalls [N screens in analysis]; recall percentage |
724 [31,024 screens] 2.33% |
849 [37,774 screens] 2.25% |
0.96 (0.87–1.06) |
One case was identified during the screening process due to clinical findings rather than a screening abnormality (exclusion of that case from analysis does not alter the estimated rate ratio).
Rate ratio with 95% CI shown in bold indicate statistical significance.