Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 30;50:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.012

Table 1.

Cancer detection rate (CDR) and recall to assessment for digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), overall and by screening round.

Digital Mammography (2D) Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (with synthetic 2D) Rate Ratio (95% CI)b
Cancers detected at screening
All screening examinations
Number of detected BCs [N screens in analysis]; CDR per 1000 screens
205 [37,436 screens]
5.48/1000
402a [46,343 screens]
8.67/1000
1.58 (1.34–1.87)
First (prevalent) screening round
Number of detected BCs [N screens in analysis]; CDR per 1000 screens
38 [6,412 screens]
5.93/1000
74 [8,569 screens]
8.64/1000
1.46 (0.99–2.15)
Repeat (incident) screening round
Number of detected BCs [N screens in analysis]; CDR per 1000 screens
167 [31,024 screens]
5.38/1000
328a [37,774 screens]
8.68/1000
1.61 (1.34–1.94)
Recall for further assessment
All screening examinations
Number of recalls [N screens in analysis]; recall percentage
1,201 [37,436 screens]
3.21%
1,180 [46,343 screens]
2.55%
0.79 (0.73–0.86)
First (prevalent) screening round
Number of recalls [N screens in analysis]; recall percentage
477 [6,412 screens]
7.44%
331 [8,569 screens]
3.86%
0.52 (0.45–0.60)
Repeat (incident) screening round
Number of recalls [N screens in analysis]; recall percentage
724 [31,024 screens]
2.33%
849 [37,774 screens]
2.25%
0.96 (0.87–1.06)
a

One case was identified during the screening process due to clinical findings rather than a screening abnormality (exclusion of that case from analysis does not alter the estimated rate ratio).

b

Rate ratio with 95% CI shown in bold indicate statistical significance.