Appendix 1—table 5. Comparison of visual with dynamic classifications.
Top: Metadata stratified by Perucca classification. There is no clear correlation between Perucca onset type and any of the clinical metadata. Bottom: Comparison of Perucca visual onset classification with our bifurcation analysis. There was no significant correlation between the two classifications. Note that numbers sometimes do not reconcile between different sections and between Appendix 1—table 4 and 5due to lack of metadata in some patients. U: unclassifiable.
| Onset | Sex | Age | Pathology | Location | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | 1–10 | 21–40 | 41–60 | CD | MTS | T | O | Te | F | Oc | P | |
| i. | 15 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| ii. | 9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| iii. | 13 | 10 | 6 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| iv. | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| v. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| vii. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| U | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Jirsa onset | Jirsa offset | ||||||||||||
| SN/SubH | SNIC | SupH | Sh/SNIC | SupH | FLC | ||||||||
| Perucca Onset | i. | 21 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 17 | ||||||
| ii. | 14 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 13 | |||||||
| iii. | 22 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 14 | |||||||
| iv. | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||||
| v. | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||
| vii. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |||||||
| U | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Jirsa Offset | SH/SNIC | 30 | 3 | 14 | |||||||||
| SupH | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||
| FLC | 53 | 3 | 7 | ||||||||||