Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun 14;13(7):e008213. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008213

Table 1.

List of all features extracted from raw LGE-MRI images and imaging-based simulation results.

Feature Category Feature Description Included in classifier (%)
Inductive SimAF nRD+MAT within N most predictive anatomical regions 100%
nRD within N most predictive anatomical regions 20%
nMAT within N most predictive anatomical regions
Mean pRD+MAT per anatomical region which induced RD or MAT localized to single most predictive anatomical region
Mean pRD per anatomical region which induced RD localized to single most predictive anatomical region
Mean pMAT per anatomical region which induced which induce MAT localized to single most predictive anatomical region
Mean pRD+MAT per anatomical region which induced RD or MAT localized to any of N most predictive anatomical regions 10%
Mean pRD per anatomical region which induced RD localized to any of N most predictive anatomical regions 10%
Mean pMAT per anatomical region which induced MAT localized to any of N most predictive anatomical regions 10%
pRD+MAT within P most predictive anatomical regions 20%
pRD within P most predictive anatomical regions
pMAT within P most predictive anatomical regions
pRD+MAT within P most predictive anatomical regions that induce RD or MAT localized to any of N most predictive reentry locations 40%
pRD within P most predictive anatomical regions that induce RD localized to any of N most predictive RD locations
pMAT within P most predictive anatomical regions that induce MAT localized to any of N most predictive MAT locations 10%
Deductive SimAF pRD+MAT (all pacing locations)
pRD (all pacing locations)
nRD (all locations)
nMAT (all locations)
nRD localized to PV region
nRD localized outside PV region
nMAT localized outside PV region
pRD that lead to RDs outside PV region (all pacing locations)
nRD+MAT (all locations)
nRD / pRD (number of RDs per inducible pacing site)
Imaging Ratio of fibrotic tissue to entire atrial myocardium
Ratio of fibrotic tissue to non-fibrotic tissue
Fibrosis entropy
Difference in ratio of FD of fibrosis between 13 to 23 voxels and 23 to 43 voxels 10%
Difference in ratio of FD of fibrosis between 23 to 43 voxels and 43 to 83 voxels
Difference in ratio of FD of fibrosis between 43 to 83 voxels and 83 to 163 voxels
Difference in ratio of FD of fibrosis between 83 to 163 voxels and 163 to 323 voxels 10%
Difference in ratio of FD of fibrosis between 163 to 323 voxels and 323 to 643 voxels
Difference in ratio of FD of fibrosis between 323 to 643 voxels and 643 to 1283 voxels
Difference in ratio of FD of fibrosis between 643 to 1283 voxels and 1283 to 2563 voxels

Features extracted for each patient from raw LGE-MRI images and imaging-based simulation results and the frequency with which each feature was selected for inclusion in the ML classifier. 10 outer loops of cross validation were performed; for example, 100% indicates that the feature was among the most predictive in all 10 outer loops. machine learning (ML), simulations of atrial fibrillation induction (SimAF), reentrant driver (RD), macro-reentrant tachycardia (MAT), number of RD and MAT observed (nRD+MAT), number of RD observed (nRD), number of MAT observed (nMAT), proportion of pacing sites that led to RD or MAT (pRD+MAT), proportion of pacing sites that led to RD (pRD), proportion of pacing sites that led to MAT (pMAT), pulmonary vein (PV), fractal dimension (FD)