Table 1.

Comparison of RNFL thickness (µm) in the study population vs reference database

RNFL sector	Mean RNFL thickness (SD) (µm) [95% CI]	Mean reference RNFL thickness (SD) (µm) (95% CI)	p valuea
Global	108.7 (10.7) [106.9–110.6]	97.1 (1.0) [96.9–97.2]	<0.001
Superotemporal	152.4 (20.3) [148.9–155.9]	134.6 (2.1) [134.3–135.0]	<0.001
Superonasal	132.6 (23.9) [128.5–136.7]	102	<0.001
Inferotemporal	150.1 (19.7) [146.7–153.5]	142.5 (2.8) [141.9–143.0]	<0.001
Inferonasal	129.2 (27.9) [124.4–134.0]	105.9 (1.1) [105.7–106.0]	<0.001
Nasal	77.7 (14.6) [75.2–80.2]	72	<0.001
Temporal	74.8 (10.3) [73.0–76.5]	74.7 (1.9) [73.9–75.6]	0.9534

^aUnpaired t-test (Bonferroni-corrected p value = 0.0024)